[PhD Quals] Plasma Moments Equations, vector calc

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the second moment equation for plasma, specifically the energy balance term. The user struggles with the term involving the electric field in the Boltzmann equation, believing it simplifies to zero but is unsure about the steps taken. Key equations and definitions are provided, including the Boltzmann equation and how to take moments. Another participant offers a transformation that clarifies the integration process, indicating a potential misunderstanding in the user's approach. The conversation highlights the complexities of plasma physics and the challenges faced in deriving the necessary equations.
erin85
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive the moments equations for a plasma. I specifically need help developing the 2nd moment equation (the Energy Balance). I can't get one of the terms...

Homework Equations



The Boltzmann Equation:
\frac{\partial f_{\sigma}}{\partial t} + \vec{v}\cdot \nabla f_{\sigma}+\frac{e_{\sigma}}{m_{\sigma}}(\vec{E}+\vec{v}\times\vec{B})\cdot \nabla_{v}f_{\sigma} = C_{\sigma} + S_{\sigma}

How to take the moment: Multiply by zn(v), then integrate over velocity (d3v), where z2=\frac{1}{2}m(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v}).

Other misc. definitions:

n_{\sigma}=\int f_{\sigma}(\vec{v})d^3v
v_{\sigma}=\int f_{\sigma}(\vec{v})\vec{v}d^3v/n_{\sigma}
and in general,
(A)_{\sigma}=\int f_{\sigma}(\vec{v})A(\vec{v})d^3v

Also, \vec{Q}_{\sigma} = (1/2)n_{\sigma}m_{\sigma}[(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})\vec{v}]_{\sigma} =energy flow,
TrM_{\sigma}= n_{\sigma}m_{\sigma}(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})_{\sigma} = scalar trace of momentum stress tensor.

The 2nd moment equation is:

\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(TrM_{\sigma})+\nabla \cdot \vec{Q}_{\sigma} = n_{\sigma}e{\sigma}\vec{v}_{\sigma}\cdot\vec{E}+R^2_{\sigma}+S^2_{\sigma}.

Don't worry about the C's, S's, and R's... those definitions are just straightforward, but annoying to type.

One last thing: \vec{A}\cdot\nabla f = \nabla \cdot f\vec{A}-f\nabla\cdot\vec{A}.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no trouble getting the first two terms... but the one with the electric field in it is tricky. I get every term going to zero...

Just taking the part of the equation with E (not v cross B yet), and a little simplfication:

\int \frac{e_{\sigma}}{2}(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})(\vec{E}\cdot\nabla_v f_{\sigma})d^3v

Grouping the v's and the E together, and using the vector identity above,
=\frac{e_{\sigma}}{2}\int d^3v [\nabla_v\cdot f_{\sigma}((\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})\vec{E}) - f_{\sigma}\nabla_v\cdot((\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})\vec{E})]

Breaking up the second term, just using the chain rule... I get a term that's del dot a dot product, which should go to zero, and a del dot E, and E is not a function of v, so should also go to zero... Maybe breaking this up via chain rule is not correct.

The first term I also feel goes to zero... the integral and the del basically cancel, so I evaluate what's left at +_ infinity.

Any help please? I am having a lot of trouble with this... and it took a freaking long time to type, so it would be really excellent to get an answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
erin85 said:

Homework Statement



Derive the moments equations for a plasma. I specifically need help developing the 2nd moment equation (the Energy Balance). I can't get one of the terms...

Homework Equations



The Boltzmann Equation:
\frac{\partial f_{\sigma}}{\partial t} + \vec{v}\cdot \nabla f_{\sigma}+\frac{e_{\sigma}}{m_{\sigma}}(\vec{E}+\vec{v}\times\vec{B})\cdot \nabla_{v}f_{\sigma} = C_{\sigma} + S_{\sigma}

How to take the moment: Multiply by zn(v), then integrate over velocity (d3v), where z2=\frac{1}{2}m(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v}).

Other misc. definitions:

n_{\sigma}=\int f_{\sigma}(\vec{v})d^3v
v_{\sigma}=\int f_{\sigma}(\vec{v})\vec{v}d^3v/n_{\sigma}
and in general,
(A)_{\sigma}=\int f_{\sigma}(\vec{v})A(\vec{v})d^3v

Also, \vec{Q}_{\sigma} = (1/2)n_{\sigma}m_{\sigma}[(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})\vec{v}]_{\sigma} =energy flow,
TrM_{\sigma}= n_{\sigma}m_{\sigma}(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})_{\sigma} = scalar trace of momentum stress tensor.

The 2nd moment equation is:

\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(TrM_{\sigma})+\nabla \cdot \vec{Q}_{\sigma} = n_{\sigma}e{\sigma}\vec{v}_{\sigma}\cdot\vec{E}+R^2_{\sigma}+S^2_{\sigma}.

Don't worry about the C's, S's, and R's... those definitions are just straightforward, but annoying to type.

One last thing: \vec{A}\cdot\nabla f = \nabla \cdot f\vec{A}-f\nabla\cdot\vec{A}.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no trouble getting the first two terms... but the one with the electric field in it is tricky. I get every term going to zero...

Just taking the part of the equation with E (not v cross B yet), and a little simplfication:

\int \frac{e_{\sigma}}{2}(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})(\vec{E}\cdot\nabla_v f_{\sigma})d^3v

Grouping the v's and the E together, and using the vector identity above,
=\frac{e_{\sigma}}{2}\int d^3v [\nabla_v\cdot f_{\sigma}((\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})\vec{E}) - f_{\sigma}\nabla_v\cdot((\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v})\vec{E})]

Breaking up the second term, just using the chain rule... I get a term that's del dot a dot product, which should go to zero, and a del dot E, and E is not a function of v, so should also go to zero... Maybe breaking this up via chain rule is not correct.

The first term I also feel goes to zero... the integral and the del basically cancel, so I evaluate what's left at +_ infinity.

Any help please? I am having a lot of trouble with this... and it took a freaking long time to type, so it would be really excellent to get an answer.

Hmm... let's see...

<br /> \int d^3 v \frac{m}{2}v^2\frac{e}{m}\vec E \cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial \vec v}<br />

<br /> =<br /> \frac{e}{2}\vec E\cdot\int d^3v v^2 \frac{\partial f}{\partial \vec v}<br />

<br /> =<br /> -\frac{e}{2}\vec E \cdot<br /> \int d^3 v f \frac{\partial}{\partial \vec v}v^2<br />

<br /> =-{e}\vec E\cdot \int d^3 v f\vec v<br />

Also, just wondering... what school are these quals for?
 
Hi, thanks for the response. Sorry, I didn't notice... physicsforum usually e-mails me when I get a response... What rule is that for the transition from the 2nd to 3rd line? Not quite sure I'm getting that step. Although it is almost 3 in the morning, and I've been studying for a while...

Also, this quals is for Georgia Tech, the nuclear engineering department.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top