Phi (the golden ratio) in prime quadruplets

Arcw
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Phi exists at the center of prime quadruplets, along with its square root, and cube root!


http://www.code144.com/zphithrice.png


The 'pos' numbers come from the position of the prime numbers in the sequence itself, i.e. 193 is the 44th prime number, and 197 is the 45th prime number, thus, the center of the prime quadruplet (105) gets assigned a value at the center of these (44.5), and these numbers can make Phi!


Do you think it is strange that Phi is hiding here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think it is strange that you think phi is "hiding" in there. What you show is the ratio of two half integers, 44.5/27.5= 1.6181818... which is NOT phi. That is a rational number while phi is irrational. Yes, it is "close" to phi (if you consider two decimal places "close") but it is easy to find numbers "close" to any given number if you look long enough.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I think it is strange that you think phi is "hiding" in there. What you show is the ratio of two half integers, 44.5/27.5= 1.6181818... which is NOT phi. That is a rational number while phi is irrational. Yes, it is "close" to phi (if you consider two decimal places "close") but it is easy to find numbers "close" to any given number if you look long enough.
Do you think it is a coincidence that the square root, and cube root (also to approximations) of Phi then directly follow, in that order, and all occur at the center of the quadruplets.

Get a probability guy over here, stat. :wink:

And by the way, it's three decimal places, not two -- and the cube root that follows is accurate to 5 decimal places.
 
You're not even using the same formula for all of them. Or the same spacing. Or the same column.

What are the odds of finding approximations of three given values when you can manipulate the formula, spacing, and column? Pretty damn good.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top