Photoelectric effect find velocity?

AI Thread Summary
To find the maximum speed of photoelectrons emitted from a metallic surface with a work function of 1.20 eV, the relevant equations include the energy of the incident photons (hf) and the kinetic energy (Ek) of the emitted electrons. The work function is converted to joules, yielding 1.92 x 10^-19 J. The frequency of the incident light is calculated to be 2.9 x 10^14 Hz. The kinetic energy of the photoelectrons is determined by subtracting the work function from the energy provided by the retarding potential, leading to a maximum speed of approximately 7.5 x 10^5 m/s. The calculations confirm the approach to solving for velocity using the photoelectric effect principles.
Sara077
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Light illuminates a metallic surface with work function of 1.20 eV. It takes 1.0 V of retarding potential to stop all of the photoelectrons from reaching the opposite plate. Find the maximum speed of the photoelectrons.

Homework Equations


hf = w

hf = w + Ek

The Attempt at a Solution



First work function = 1.20eV(1.60x10-19 J/eV) = 1.92x10-19 J

Not really sure how to do this problem... but giving it a go here:

First,

hf = w

f = w/h

f = 1.92x10-19 J / 6.63x10-34 Js

f = 2.9x1014 Hz

Now i got the frequency, i assume i use:
hf = w+ Ek
Ek = hf - w
1/2mv2 = hf - w

Is this correct so far? If yes do i just plug in the numbers and solve for "v" also not really sure what to do with the retarding potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or if the above isn't correct i tried it a different way...

Ek = eV
Ek = (1.60x10-19 C) (1.6V)
Ek = 2.56x10-19 J
^^ Should i subtract the work function from this?

Ek = 1/2mv2
2.56x10-19 J = 1/2 (9.11x10-31 kg (v)2
5.62x1011 Jkg = v2
7.5x105 m/s = v

Is this one correct?? I am just confused
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top