1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Photon aceleration

  1. Feb 22, 2005 #1

    woz

    User Avatar

    I have been wondering wether a photon has acceleration or not, how does it reach the 300,000 km/s? does a photon even need to accelerate?

    I would also appreciate your telling me about rest mass, how does it work, what does it cause, etc.

    WoZ
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 22, 2005 #2
    The photon has no rest mass, so it doesn't need to accelerate.
     
  4. Feb 22, 2005 #3
    An acceleration is a change in velocity. Photons always move at the speed of light, as do all massless particles.
     
  5. Feb 23, 2005 #4
    There's one thing though. A photon does have momentum, so when an atom emits a photon it has to recoil slightly.
     
  6. Feb 24, 2005 #5

    Mk

    User Avatar

    Well, what Woz is trying to ask is, how does it start moving in the first place... maybe.

    It takes an infintesimal amount of energy to accelerate a luxon, a particle with no rest mass, such as a photon, but not zero. Once it gets accelerated to the exclusively luxonic speed of the speed of light in a vacuum, from that infintesimal amount of energy, it needs no more, it doesn't slow down or speed up, unless of course it goes through a medium.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2005
  7. Feb 24, 2005 #6

    GENIERE

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    It may be absorbed or scattered but always propagates at C.
     
  8. Feb 24, 2005 #7
    The photon is propagating at c as soon as it is created. It is not that there is initially a photon 'at rest' that needs to be accelerated to c.
     
  9. Feb 24, 2005 #8

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    When was this "luxon" experimentally discovered or verified? Oh wait... it hasn't?

    Then why are you using a hypothetical particle to contradict something that HAS been experimentally verified, and has an unbelievably accurate theory (QED)? That's like using a pseudoscience to disprove a science!

    Take note of the statement already mentioned, that if a photon has to accelerate, it means that over some finite time, it IS NOT travelling at c in vacuum! This violates SR! We need to shake a few people up so that they somehow can get free from the classical newtonian mechanics here...

    Zz.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Photon aceleration
  1. Photon ? (Replies: 2)

Loading...