What is the current understanding of the photon and its interaction with matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karthiksrao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
Karthiksrao
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I have been going through the paper "Evolution of the modern photon" by Kidd,Ardini and Anton. This was published in 1989.

In the paper, he describes the various 'models' of photons that have come up over time including the corpuscular model, the singularity model, wave packet model and the QED model.

He lays stress on the fact that 'at present' (in 1989) the QED model seems to fit the bill quite well, in the sense that most of the phenomena observed can be explained using this model.

I wish to know what has changed in the last 20 years. Is the QED model still holding its ground.

Also, I've understood the QED model as that which postulates that interaction of light with matter as being quantized but the field or radiation itself is un-quantized/continuous. Have I understood it correctly?

Thanks,
Karthik
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QED is a quantum field theory. This means that all particles (photons included) are treated as excitations of a quantized field. So, no, you have not understood it correctly. In QED, the EM field is quantized and the photon is the quantum of that field. A model in which unquantized (or "classical") EM fields interact with quantum mechanical matter is usually termed a "semi-classical" model.
 
By 'excitation', do you mean a ripple, which propagates through space at speed of light?
 
Not a terrible analogy, provided you include the understanding that ripples of a given frequency can only have discrete quantities of energy, with the size of the discrete unit being proportional to the frequency of the ripple.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top