Photon colliding with stationary mass

AI Thread Summary
A photon colliding with a stationary mass creates a new particle, and the discussion revolves around determining this particle's mass and speed using energy-momentum conservation principles. The total 4-momentum before the collision is expressed as Pbefore = (E+m, p, 0, 0), leading to a proposed Pafter = (E', p', 0, 0). The conservation laws imply E' = E + m, and the equations E = γmc², p = γmv, and E² = p²c² + m²c⁴ are crucial for solving for the new particle's mass and speed. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between energy and momentum, particularly for a photon, to accurately apply these equations. The final particle must move in the same direction as the photon, confirming the need for careful consideration of momentum conservation.
Dennydont
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A photon with energy E collides with stationary mass m. They form a single particle together, what is this new particle's mass and what is its speed?

Homework Equations


Energy-momentum 4-vector P=(E, px, py, pz)
Possibly P2=m2

The Attempt at a Solution


Using 4- momenta, the particle moving with energy E has a 4-momenta of P1 = (E, p, 0, 0) and the stationary mass is P2 = (m, 0, 0, 0). The total momentum before the collision is then Pbefore = (E+m, p, 0, 0). My question is, what exactly would the Pafter equal to? Could it possibly be: Pafter = (E', p', 0, 0)
If so that would show that E' = E+m (due to conservation of energy). How can I find the mass of the new particle from that? Does the second equation of m2 have anything to do with it?[/SUB]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Dennydont said:
How can I find the mass of the new particle from that?
You have the expression for the mass of a particle right here:

Dennydont said:
Possibly P2=m2
 
Orodruin said:
You have the expression for the mass of a particle right here:
Great, do I have all the tools to solve this then? Is Pafter = (E', p', 0, 0) correct? How can I find the speed then?
 
Dennydont said:
Great, do I have all the tools to solve this then? Is Pafter = (E', p', 0, 0) correct? How can I find the speed then?
For a particle you have three important equations that you must not forget:

##E = \gamma mc^2##

##p = \gamma mv##

##E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4##

In particular, if you know the energy and momentum of a particle, you can calculate its mass, velocity and gamma factor.

You should experiment with these equations to see how you can do this.
 
PeroK said:
For a particle you have three important equations that you must not forget:

##E = \gamma mc^2##

##p = \gamma mv##

##E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4##

In particular, if you know the energy and momentum of a particle, you can calculate its mass, velocity and gamma factor.

You should experiment with these equations to see how you can do this.
These equations are rather useful, but I just want to know if Pafter = (E', p', 0, 0). If so I can substitute E' as E+m and p' as p, using conservation of energy and momentum laws. Thanks to the third equation you've given me, I can say that p = √(E2-m2) and p' = √(E2-m2) and solve for m' since we are saying that c=1 in this example. I can't see why Pafter isn't what I think it is, the new particle doesn't travel on an angle or anything like that.
 
Dennydont said:
Great, do I have all the tools to solve this then? Is Pafter = (E', p', 0, 0) correct? How can I find the speed then?
The 4-momentum is proportional to the 4-velocity. You can use this fact to find the speed. In other words, how would you find the speed if I gave you a 4-velocity?
 
Dennydont said:
These equations are rather useful, but I just want to know if Pafter = (E', p', 0, 0). If so I can substitute E' as E+m and p' as p, using conservation of energy and momentum laws. Thanks to the third equation you've given me, I can say that p = √(E2-m2) and p' = √(E2-m2) and solve for m' since we are saying that c=1 in this example. I can't see why Pafter isn't what I think it is, the new particle doesn't travel on an angle or anything like that.

You should satisfy yourself from conservation of momentum that the final particle must move in the same direction as the photon.

Also, I think you're missing the relationship between the energy and momentum of a photon. Hint: only one of those three equations holds for a photon.
 
PeroK said:
You should satisfy yourself from conservation of momentum that the final particle must move in the same direction as the photon.

Also, I think you're missing the relationship between the energy and momentum of a photon. Hint: only one of those three equations holds for a photon.
I do not think the problem is what you perceive it is. A student using 4-vector notation should already be familiar with what you have said, which is essentially the statement of the components if the 4-momentum for a massive particle.
 
Back
Top