Photon energy and specific heat capacity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a discrepancy in calculations related to photon energy and specific heat capacity. The user finds that using the book's answer for part a allows them to solve parts b and c correctly, but they are unsure about their approach to part a. They question whether assuming blood evaporates at 100 degrees Celsius is the source of their confusion. Despite their doubts, they believe the book's answer of 5.1*10^{-3} J is accurate, especially since no other vaporization temperature is provided. The user concludes that there may be an error in the book's solutions or an oversight in their understanding.
Fluxthroughme
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
amtftl.jpg


If I use the answer given in the book for part a, I can get the correct answers for b and c. However, I do not know what I have done wrong in part a? My best guess would be that assuming the blood evaporates at 100 degrees is incorrect? The answer given in the book is 5.1*10^{-3}J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems correct to me... and if they ask you to use same data as water, I also assume that using 100°C is correct as vaporization point (also because you do not have it given, and you would need it to do the problem, so it has to be 100°C).

Perhaps the book has wrong solutions, or something else is going on I can't see, but to me it is correct
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top