Photon self-interference interpreted as inside-out dynamic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamic Photon
AI Thread Summary
Photon self-interference is explained through the concept of an "inside-out" phase character, where a single photon can interfere with itself by utilizing both its interior (virtual) and exterior (real) wavefunctions. This interpretation addresses the double-slit experiment, highlighting how measurement affects observation outcomes. The discussion posits that the dynamical universe is inverted by photon actions, suggesting that our phase space is a blend of real, virtual, and mixed states. The idea is presented that photons inherently carry the information necessary for self-interference, linking the inverse wavefunction to its conventional counterpart. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the significance of nonlocality and the intrinsic connections within quantum mechanics.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Photon self-interference interpreted as "inside-out" dynamic

My http://www.quantumdream.net first article, "P-Duality: Quantum Mechanics Inside-Out," explains my concept of the inverse wavefunction, applicable to the virtual realm and its real interactions.

The double-slit experiment was Feynman's favorite demonstration of quantum mechanics. It raises the questions of how individual particles can interfere with themselves and how the act of measurement can interfere with observation outcome.

I address the problem of the double-slit experiment by explaining that photons have an "inside-out" phase character, correlated at a primal event. Inverse phase space contains compactified within the photon all information of its conventional phase space. Thus a single photon enables self interference between its interior (virtual) and exterior (real) wavefunctions.

In effect, the dynamical universe is inverted through the photon action. Our phase space is part real, part virtual, and part mixed - part subliminal, part superluminal, and part luminal. The observer perspective is that of self, other and their correlation.

Can you appreciate the possibility that the photon itself naturally carries the information needed to perpetuate self-interference through the interactions between the inverse wavefunction and its conventional counterpart?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Inside phase space self-interference: nonlocality

Loren Booda said:
My http://www.quantumdream.net first article, "P-Duality: Quantum Mechanics Inside-Out," explains my concept of the inverse wavefunction, applicable to the virtual realm and its real interactions.

The double-slit experiment was Feynman's favorite demonstration of quantum mechanics. It raises the questions of how individual particles can interfere with themselves and how the act of measurement can interfere with observation outcome.

I address the problem of the double-slit experiment by explaining that photons have an "inside-out" phase character, correlated at a primal event. Inverse phase space contains compactified within the photon all information of its conventional phase space. Thus a single photon enables self interference between its interior (virtual) and exterior (real) wavefunctions.

In effect, the dynamical universe is inverted through the photon action. Our phase space is part real, part virtual, and part mixed - part subliminal, part superluminal, and part luminal. The observer perspective is that of self, other and their correlation.

Can you appreciate the possibility that the photon itself naturally carries the information needed to perpetuate self-interference through the interactions between the inverse wavefunction and its conventional counterpart?

I was surprised by your post as I have a very similar construction myself. Our words may differ, but the fundamental concepts are very very close. I have a link that http://frontiernet.net/~mgh1/ through various arrangements of Stern-Gerlach segments. Its a graphics rich tutorial on Stern-Gerlach and two hole diffraction. Pure QM heresy.

I have called the elements that guarantee the reformation of the +S base state after transitioning through the unobstructed T segment, unobserved or nonlocal, and existence critical to the reformation of the +S base state from the +S -> T -> +S transition.

How does the particle know how to return to the proper state, which is after all, a polarized direction of the particle's magnetic monopole? It knows because the T state is not simply one of three possible states, as the T has the nonlocal elements of the +S state embedded intrinsically within the T state. Of all the nonlocality, inverse wave functions, you name it, there is an unambiguous reality of force exchanges between local and nonlocal entities. Nonlocal ain't a philosophy, it's a reality, maybe the reality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top