Photon vs other fundamental particles - decoherence

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
1. What (property) makes a photon less likely to decohere/(entangle with the environment) relative to other "fundamental" particles (non leptons?) such as an electron?...say during single particle interference experiment

Photon single particle interference can done without the need for a vacuum.



2 Which other "fundamental" particles can show interference (easily) without having to create a vacuum?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons are interacting only electromagnetically, which is a pretty weak interaction, and the surrounding matter in our labs is (nearly) electrically neutral. So it's pretty easy to keep a photon nearly free, i.e., not undergoing interactions with surrounding matter.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
vanhees71 said:
Photons are interacting only electromagnetically, which is a pretty weak interaction, and the surrounding matter in our labs is (nearly) electrically neutral. So it's pretty easy to keep a photon nearly free, i.e., not undergoing interactions with surrounding matter.
Thanks vanhees.

So besides electromagnetic what other (not so weak) interaction does an electron have? (That a photon doesn't)

When we keep a photon nearly free - is the photon assumed entangled with itself?
 
Last edited:
San K said:
Thanks vanhees.

So besides electromagnetic what other (not so weak) interaction does an electron have? (That a photon doesn't)

When we keep a photon nearly free - is the photon assumed entangled with itself?

The photon is neutral, while the electron is charged - thus even the electromagnetic interactions of the electron are stronger.

As a practical matter, photon sources are also easier to set up and manage than electron sources.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
San K said:
1. What (property) makes a photon less likely to decohere/(entangle with the environment)

and/or more prone to deco/entaspin orientation.
.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top