Photon's disagree of the state of the universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JPBenowitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    State Universe
JPBenowitz
Messages
144
Reaction score
2
So in modern physics we were going through SR and I had a question: since gravitational fields effect the amount of time elapsed and speed of a particle; say we have photon A emitted at the origin (0,0) and photon B emitted at (2,2) such that there is a uniformly decreasing gravitational field in both (T,x) and (T',x'). Photon A and Photon B wold disagree on the state of the universe such that Photon B would be traveling slightly faster then Photon A given they both travel slightly less than c. Is this true? Do observers O and O' disagree on the gravitational field relative to each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thing about photons is that they don't travel faster than one another. No matter what observer measures their speed they will get the same value c. Even if the observer were traveling at the speed of a photon, the other photons would pass by at the measured speed of c.

SR takes as an assumption that c is a constant for all inertial frames of reference.

Gravity affects light by bending it or changing its energy. Blue light escaping from the vicinity of a black hole will not appear blue to a far away observer as its energy is reduced and its wavelength lengthened. The blue light will be red-shifted.
 
jedishrfu said:
The thing about photons is that they don't travel faster than one another. No matter what observer measures their speed they will get the same value c. Even if the observer were traveling at the speed of a photon, the other photons would pass by at the measured speed of c.

SR takes as an assumption that c is a constant for all inertial frames of reference.

Gravity affects light by bending it or changing its energy. Blue light escaping from the vicinity of a black hole will not appear blue to a far away observer as its energy is reduced and its wavelength lengthened. The blue light will be red-shifted.

Instead of saying the photons "travel" slightly less than c can I say the gravitational field warps space-time in a manner that increases the distance between two points x and x_0 such that the photons arrive at x later than if ideally there was no gravitational field?
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top