Photons - Trying to find distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nitric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance from which the naked eye can detect a 60-W lightbulb, given that the eye can detect as few as five photons per second. Participants emphasize the need to determine the number of photons emitted by the bulb and how they disperse in space, forming an imaginary sphere around the light source. The conversation highlights the importance of using the energy of the bulb and the energy of individual photons to find the relevant formulas. By applying the known detection threshold of five photons per second, one can derive the distance by manipulating the equations related to photon emission and detection. This approach illustrates a common physics problem-solving technique involving assumptions and calculations to find unknown variables.
Nitric
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. The night-adapted eye can detect as few as several photons per second -- say five to be definite. Assuming that the pupil of the eye is 0.6 cm in diameter, from what distance would it be possible for the naked eye to detect a 60-W lightbulb?



2. I'm not sure which equation to use. In the section where the problem is from, I get teh follow equations (which don't help me)
E=pc, E=hf, h=6.63x10^-34, p=h/lamda




3. Not sure which formula to use
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you will need to know how many photons the light emits per second. You can do this by picking a frequency near the low end of the visible range (to end up with the minimum), and using the energy of the bulb and the energy of the photon. Guess or look up the energy efficiency of a light bulb.

The next thing is how the photons from the bulb spread out in space. They go out in all directions equally, so light up an imaginary sphere at the distance where the eye is. The question is what portion of that lit up area is caught by the eye.
 
It says 5 photons/sec in the question.
 
Yes, you know the 5 per sec answer so you can use the expression for the # of photons hitting the eye - which has a d in it - to solve for the distance.

Physics often works that way. You pretend you know something like the distance to the source, work out other quantities based on that unknown, and when you find one you know the answer for, you can solve for the unknown. Very useful trick!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top