Photovoltaic Effect in CdS or CdSe

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the elusive references to Audobert and Stora, who allegedly observed the photovoltaic effect in Cadmium Sulfide (CdS) or Cadmium Selenide (CdSe) in 1932. Despite numerous citations in literature, including the U.S. Department of Energy's history of solar technology, no primary source or detailed information about these individuals has been found. The only notable work on CdS is attributed to D.C. Reynolds in 1954, suggesting that the 1932 investigations likely pertained to CdSe. The lack of concrete references raises questions about the credibility of the claims surrounding Audobert and Stora.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photovoltaic technology and its historical context
  • Familiarity with Cadmium Sulfide (CdS) and Cadmium Selenide (CdSe) properties
  • Knowledge of academic citation practices and primary source identification
  • Basic research skills, particularly in accessing scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the original works of D.C. Reynolds on Cadmium Sulfide published in 1954
  • Investigate the historical context of solar technology development in the 1930s
  • Explore the Handbook of Energy by Cleveland et al. for insights on photovoltaic advancements
  • Search for any patents or papers related to Audobert and Stora in German or French archives
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, historians of technology, and professionals in the photovoltaic industry seeking to clarify the origins of early solar technology claims and improve their understanding of the historical development of solar cells.

Vagn
Messages
520
Reaction score
65
I have a somewhat different question to the usual sort asked.

In the literature on photovoltaics numerous authors, both academic and popular refer to an Audobert and Stora who in 1932 observed the photovoltaic effect in either CdS or CdSe, depending on the author, however no citation is given. No first names or initials are ever given for the Audobert or Stora either to aid in identifying them.
Examples in the literature are section 2 here, under 1932 here and table 2 here. which all refer to CdS and Section 2 here which refers to CdSe.
The US DoE also features the claim in its 'history of solar' page here
In Shirland's 1966 review of CdS Solar Cells, he makes no reference to the pair, only noting Reynolds' work alongside that of Nadjakov et al. none of the co-authors of whom could be the enigmatic Audobert or Stora.

I've tried for some time to find the original reference of Audobert and Stora, however I've hand no luck in finding it and neither the library at my institute or google seems to have it either, or any record of Audobert or Stora.
As such I was wondering if anyone has come across either the original paper or patent, or has any idea who Audobert or Stora could be?

Their names sound like they are Scandinavian and could perhaps have been working in Germany in the 1930s, and judging by the time period in question I suspect that the original paper or patent may have been in German. There are a few French Audoberts also so it is possible they were in France at the time.

If anyone has come across this pair before, any information would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am interested by how many website say essentially that Audobert and Stora discovered the photoelectric effect in one or the other of those compounds in 1932 without citation.

I found two pdfs that credit the following for the information:
  • Cleveland CJ. Handbook of Energy. In: Handbook of Energy.Vol II. Elsevier; 2014:287-302. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-417013-1.00015-7.
  • U.S. Deparment of Energy EE and RE. The Histroy of Solar Technology. Pennyhill Press 2013:1- 12.
  • Vesselinka Petrova-Koch, Rudolf Hezel, Adolf Goetzberger, “High –Efficient Low- Cost Photovoltaics: recent Developments”, Springer series in optical sciences (2008)
 
This was found on page 2 of a Google search,: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=Audobert&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5

It points to: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116000836
Which is behind a pay wall.

Notice that the reference below to Audobert and Stora has a reference or footnote.Technological development trends in Solar‐powered Aircraft Systems
G Abbe, H Smith - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016 - Elsevier
… This was followed by advancements in material compositions to improve the photoelectric effect
such as cadmium sulphide by Audobert and Stora in 1932 [5]. A major step in solar technology
was the development of Photovoltaic (PV) technology in the United States in 1954 …
Cited by 22 Related articles All 5 versions

------------------------
On pg 3, this:
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1087&context=ece_etds
references:
Vesselinka Petrova-Koch, Rudolf Hezel, Adolf Goetzberger, “High –Efficient Low-Cost Photovoltaics: recent Developments”, Springer series in optical sciences (2008)

------------------------
Generally, findings report either no references or report WikiPedia, not really a primary source. A confounding factor is that 'Audobert' is a region in France which has an Archaeologically important cave.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. Please let us know if you find anything, you've got me curious now.
 
Vagn said:
Examples in the literature are section 2 here, under 1932 here and table 2 here. which all refer to CdS and Section 2 here which refers to CdSe.

I can only say that the first report on the photovoltaic effect in Cadmium Sulfide seems to be the work by Reynolds in 1954 ("Photovoltaic Effect in Cadmium Sulfide", D.C. Reynolds et al., Phys. Rev. 96, 533 (1954)), so it seems likely that the investigations in 1932 have focused on Cadmium Selenide.
Tom.G said:
This was found on page 2 of a Google search,: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=Audobert&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5

It points to: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116000836
Which is behind a pay wall.

Notice that the reference below to Audobert and Stora has a reference or footnote.

This one points to Cleveland et al. entry in the Handbook of Energy mentioned in the post above yours. Unfortunately, this entry only contains a timeline without further references.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K