What is the true definition and impact of the placebo effect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simon Bridge
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the interpretation of the placebo effect, with a focus on whether it signifies the body's ability to heal itself based solely on patient beliefs. One viewpoint suggests that the placebo effect is more accurately described as patients feeling better without actual improvement in their condition. There is mention of a potential link between positive attitudes and improved immune responses, noting that individuals with a negative outlook may struggle to recover. However, skepticism is expressed regarding the validity of this perspective, highlighting that the placebo effect is primarily observed in self-reported experiences of symptoms rather than physiological changes. The conversation emphasizes that while mathematical models are important in science, conclusions drawn from weak models regarding the placebo effect may be misleading, particularly as significant effects are predominantly noted in studies related to pain, anxiety, and depression.
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
17,871
Reaction score
1,661
Has the author got the wrong end of the stick?
http://phys.org/news/2012-08-insights-placebo-effect.html

He seems to be saying that the placebo effect is the bodies ability to heal itself without outside cause (beyond the patients beliefs).

I understood "placebo effect" to be more when a patient feels better without getting better.

Perhaps they are talking about the special case where a positive attitude improves immune response - despondent people tend not to get better as easily?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
IT seems oddball to me as well. It is however a mathematical model. Science thrives on math. However. This appears to be the case where some people are drawing conclusions from a weak model.
 
The placebo effect is based on a persons belief's about an intervention, its generally only really evident in peoples self reported subjective experience of their symptoms. There is little evidence it has an effect on the physiology associated with health problems. The largest effects are seen in studies of pain, anxiety and depression.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1847831/
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top