Physical interpretation of a determinate?

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
I just finished my first Linear Algebra class and loved it. There is one thing we didn't go over much though. What exactly IS a determinate? Is there a physical interpretation? Or is it just an operator that has these special properties?

Thanks!
~Matt
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You mean determinant. There are many kinds of determinant, one for 2 X 2 matrices, one for 3 x 3 matrices, and so on. You can think of a determinant as a function that maps a square matrix of a particular size to an element of some field (e.g., the reals or the complex numbers).

AFAIK, there isn't any physical interpretation of a determinant.
 
No mathematical concept has one "physical interpretation" but can be given many physical interpretations by applying them to different physical situations.

One physical interpretation of the determinant is this: if a "prism" (a solid like a "tilted" rectangular solid) has edges at one point given by a\vec{i}+ b\vec{j}+ c\vec{k}, d\vec{i}+ e\vec{j}+ f\vec{k}, and g\vec{i}+ h\vec{j}+ i\vec{k} then its volume is the determinant
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}a & b & c \\ d & e & f\\ g & h & i\end{array}\right|

That, or variations on it, often show up in calculating "tensor densities".
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top