Physical interpretation of this integral equation involving distance and time?

[Irishdoug]

Homework Statement

I have been given a generic question, however I don't know how to interpret it if the variables had an assigned meaning.

Relevant Equations

f'(x) = $\frac{d}{dx}$ ($\int$ $\frac{1-t^2}{1+t^2}$ *dt). The integral has the limits 0-x.

I am able to solve the problem however if x was position and t was time how is this problem interpreted?

I know, for example that $\frac{dx}{dt}$ tells us how the position of something changes as time changes (or instantaneous change) and an integral gives a net change so to speak.

 

[Ray Vickson]

I am able to solve the problem however if x was position and t was time how is this problem interpreted?

I know, for example that $\frac{dx}{dt}$ tells us how the position of something changes as time changes (or instantaneous change) and an integral gives a net change so to speak.

You can easily write $\int_0^x (1-t^2)/(1+t^2) \, dt$; just right-click on the image to see the LaTeX commands.

Anyway, why should $f(x)$ and/or $f'(x)$ have any particular "interpretation"? Maybe this is just a problem in calculus without any interpretation or without any relation to distance and time.

 

[Irishdoug]

Im asking more so about the RHS of the equation. The reason I want to know how to interpret it as I do physics and equations require a physical interpretation.

 

[Ray Vickson]

Im asking more so about the RHS of the equation. The reason I want to know how to interpret it as I do physics and equations require a physical interpretation.

If the integral arises in some "application" in physics, engineering, chemistry, biology, economics, ... then you may be able to come up with a reasonable interpretation. If it is just a calculus practice-example there may not be any interpretation, and you are wasting your time looking for one. It would be much, much better to just realize that calculus is a branch of mathematics that is widely applicable to numerous fields and situations, and that not everything need be related to physics. Equations definitely do NOT need a physical interpretation, although you may find it difficult to accept this. Basically, I am saying that you are hindering your own learning process by constantly trying to give a physical interpretation to everything. (I say this as somebody who earned a PhD in physics from MIT.)

 

[Irishdoug]

Ok thanks for the heads up!

 

[PeroK]

I am able to solve the problem however if x was position and t was time how is this problem interpreted?

I know, for example that $\frac{dx}{dt}$ tells us how the position of something changes as time changes (or instantaneous change) and an integral gives a net change so to speak.

$t$ looks more like a dummy integration variable here than time. For example, you can (almost) write:

$f(x) = \int_0^x g(x) dx$

But, technically, you are using $x$ as both the dummy integration variable and the variable for which your function is defined.

In general it's better to use different symbols for the two variables. For example:

$f(x) = \int_0^x g(x') dx' = \int_0^x g(u) du$

Or, in your case, $t$ is used as the dummy variable.