Physics 1 with Calculus: Pre-reqs and Advice

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the suitability of taking a physics course without formal prior experience. A user questions whether being familiar with basic physics concepts is adequate for enrolling in a physics course with calculus, given that the school recommends taking a general physics class first for those lacking physics background. The syllabus for general physics emphasizes problem-solving and covers mechanics, heat, and thermodynamics, aimed at students in health and biological sciences. In contrast, the physics with calculus course is designed for physics, chemistry, and engineering majors, covering similar topics but with a more rigorous approach, including laboratory work. Participants express that while general physics may be seen as a simplified version of the subject, it is often viewed as insufficient for those pursuing more advanced studies. Some suggest that students without a strong physics foundation may struggle in calculus-based courses, while others believe that those familiar with basic concepts can catch up quickly.
leroyjenkens
Messages
615
Reaction score
49
I've never taken a formal physics class, but I'm familiar with the basics. The only prerequisite listed on the school website is calc 1, which I'm taking in the summer, but they have a note at the bottom that they recommend you take "general physics 1" if you don't have any physics experience. Is being familiar with the basics good enough? General physics goes over the basics, like Newton's laws and stuff like that. Does "physics with calculus" do the same, but just with some calculus calculations thrown in?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the syllabus look like for Gen phy and Phy 1?
 
I'm not sure how to view the syllabus, but on the website that shows me which classes I can take for my degree, it has this information listed for general physics:

"The course, designed for those students who are majoring in pre-med, physical therapy, pre-optometry, pre-dental, pre-veterinary, biological sciences, technology and geology, stresses problem-solving abilities. Subject matter includes mechanics, heat and thermodynamics."

And this information listed for physics with calculus:

"This course, designed for students majoring in physics, chemistry and engineering, includes mechanics, conservation principles, rotational and harmonic motions, heat, thermodynamics and waves. Laboratory work will illustrate important principles and develop techniques. It is recommended that the student with no prior physics take PHY 2053C (this is general physics 1)."

This is where it says the "no prior physics" thing. While I don't have any formal physics classes under my belt, I've had a good amount of experience with physics.
 
I would just take Physics I. The first part is fairly simple, and you should be able to get up to speed, but I doubt it would be a problem for anyone. At my univ. that General Physics class (called something different here, but the same class) is simply a watered down version of some very basic Newtonian mechanics so med students have a chance to meet their physics requirements. It's a joke really.
 
At my school we have 3 into physics classes. Intro to physics, Algebra based I+II and Calculus based I+II.

The intro class was for people who didnt take physics in high school or made a C (like me v_v). The class was absolutely worthless. It was 2 credit course that covered most of the subjects that other physics courses cover in 2 semesters.

It was like okay this is work and work equals Force * perpendicular distance. Next topic.

The algebra based physics is the one for med students. Everyone else takes calculus based.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top