Physics as a dream ? Need courage * advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter magorium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an individual's passion for theoretical physics and their desire to self-educate in the field while pursuing a mechanical engineering degree and a military career. The individual expresses a commitment to understanding the universe, emphasizing that they do not seek an official physics degree or academic recognition. They plan to study the same materials as physics students and are prepared to seek help when needed. The conversation highlights the paradox of increasing knowledge leading to a diminishing sense of understanding about the universe. Additionally, it touches on the idea that understanding can come from various life experiences, not just formal education, suggesting that insights can be gained from everyday activities. The overall tone reflects a deep enthusiasm for learning and a philosophical approach to the pursuit of knowledge.
magorium
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
First of all , I'm glad I found this forum while searching the mathematics of string theory.

I want to directly tell you my problem. Well ; I have two ambitions in my life and one is Theoretical Physics. It is a bit more like a passion. In my country , high school education divides into three courses. Literature - Middle (half literature half math) and Science (Full science). I am graduated from science course (4 years). Now , actually having a great will to work on Physics , my second ambition as having a Military career is on way. I am a cadet (Military Student - Land forces). But I am educating as a Mechanical Engineer (having all courses universities have as Mechanical engineering). When I graduate I'll have also Mech. Eng. diploma.

Enough storyline :) Here is the question. I have lots of time. My school is 4 years like all universities. And while this 4 years education , I want to educate my self just like a Physics student do. I'll have the all courses they had for their University education. I "do not" care about having a Physics degree officially. Did Fermat had a Mathematics PhD? I give no care for being a Professor a day or not. Only I care is understanding the universe. This is my humanitarian responsibilty to. If I can make a real contribute to our understanding about universe that'll be my great honor and pleasure. I am going to buy all the books they buy. Learn all the lessons they do. If I can't understand something , I'll ask here or go to a University for it. Why I write this ? Well , sometimes I do need some courage. That might look really hard to achieve but when looking from the both sides ;

Deterministic : If I meant to success , I will success.
Possiblistic : If the Universe is a possiblity universe , then success is a possiblity. If it is , It'll worth trying.

I can understand Physics by reading mostly. And as Einstein said ; I have to do If I can do it. I have to do it as best as I can. This is my sacred human responsibilty. Less is unforgivable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
magorium said:
Only I care is understanding the universe. This is my humanitarian responsibilty to.

1) One thing that you should be prepared for is that as you know more, the amount of understanding you have about the universe will become less and less. I've given up trying to understand everything about universe, and right now I'm lucky if I understand *anything* about the universe.

2) Physicists aren't the only people that try to understand the universe. Cooks and janitors understand parts of the universe. One thing that I figured out yesterday was that it's a bad idea to create an egg sandwich with a bagel and an egg sunny-side up, and that if I want that I need to scramble the egg. That's a tiny bit of understanding about the universe that I didn't have the day before.
 
Haha, twofish-quant, your posts are really helpful, but you really do get stuck on that wanting to understand the universe part ;)
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top