Physics cannot be based on the field concept

AI Thread Summary
Einstein's quote reflects his skepticism about the field concept in physics, suggesting that reliance on continuous structures may undermine foundational theories, including gravitation. He implies that scientific theories, including his own, are provisional and subject to revision with new evidence. The discussion highlights a sense of disappointment regarding the pursuit of a Unified Field Theory, indicating that the limitations of the field concept could hinder progress. Without full context, the interpretation of his words may lead to misunderstandings. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the tentative nature of scientific understanding and the potential for future revelations.
Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
Can someone clarify the following quote?

I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics. (Albert Einstein, 1954)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like some guy named Albert Einstein said it around 1954 to me.
 
How immature?
 
Nusc said:
Can someone clarify the following quote?
I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics. (Albert Einstein, 1954)

Einstein simply meant that all scientific theories (his own included) should be regarded as tentative since new knowledge (data) may one day show them to be in error.
 
Nusc said:
How immature?
Well jeez... someone's a grumpy poopoo head.
 
Nusc said:
Can someone clarify the following quote?
I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics. (Albert Einstein, 1954)
I'm going to guess this is an expression of disapointment at not having arrived at a Unified Field Theory. He may have been simply acknowledging that this failure was due to the possibility that the very concept of fields was not going to lend itself to analysis the way he wanted.

If we had the whole context, of course, what he meant would probably be clear. Disembodied quotes can be mysterious and easily misconstrued.
 
Back
Top