Physics Experiment: Jerk & Inertia | Solving for dA/dt

AI Thread Summary
The physics experiment demonstrates the difference in tension between two strings when subjected to gradual versus sudden force. When the thread is pulled gradually, the top string breaks due to increased tension, while a sudden jerk causes the bottom string to break instead. The discussion involves modeling the tension as a delta function to analyze the rate of change of acceleration (jerk) and its impact on the strings. The equations derived indicate that the mass undergoes simple harmonic motion after an impulse is applied, with maximum tension in the upper string being significantly lower than that in the lower string during a quick jerk. Ultimately, the analysis shows that steady pulling results in greater tension in the upper string, leading to its failure.
Pax
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
There is this experiment my high school teacher showed in physics class. You are probably aware of it
More%20inertia%20experiments2_720.jpg
(from practicalphysics.org)

There is a video of a teacher actually doing the experiment here:
https://sites.google.com/site/haatscience/physics/221-the-effect-of-inertia

Gradually pull the thread and the top thread breaks, jerk the thread and the bottom one breaks.

I tried to set up a free body diagram to show how this works, and most specifically to solve for the rate of change of acceleration (jerk) that will be the threshold between the top string breaking and the bottom.

I am at a loss, how do you put dA/dt into the equations?

Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • More%20inertia%20experiments2_720.jpg
    More%20inertia%20experiments2_720.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 856
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Physics news on Phys.org
This one seems to be an experiment where you could model it as a tension that is applied. With a sudden jerk, the tension in the bottom string could be modeled as a delta function: ## T_1(t)=T_{10} \delta (t) ##. Because much of this is absorbed by the acceleration of the mass, the tension in the top string ## T_2 ## never reaches anywhere near the large value, basically infinite, of the ## T_1(t) ## with its delta function. ## \\ ## (In principle, you could limit ## T_1(t) ## to a finite value, by using some other function with characteristics similar to a delta function. For what gets transferred to the mass with a quick jerk, it is basically the impulse which is the integral ## I=\int T_1(t) \, dt ##).## \\ ## Meanwhile, elasticity equations are needed for the top string: ## T_2=k (x-L) ## where ## x ## is the position of the mass ## M ## (with origin ## x=0 ## at the top position of the attachment of the string), and ## L ## is the length of the string with no mass attached. ## \\ ## The mass ## M ## has ## Mg+T_ 1-T_2=M \ddot{x}=Mg+T_{10} \delta(t)-k(x-L) ## , with initial conditions that ## Mg= k(x_o-L) ##. ## \\ ## You can solve for ## x(t) ## , and then for ## T_2(t)=k(x-L) ##. ## \\ ## Anyway, I haven't solved these equations, but I think they would give the necessary result. ## \\ ## Edit, along with a correction to my first attempt at a solution here: ## \\ ## I get for ## t \leq 0 ##, that ## x(t)= \frac{Mg}{k}+L##, and ## T_2(t)=Mg ## , ## \\ ## and for ## t>0 ##, an impulse has been added to the mass ## M ##, giving it an initial velocity, but no immediate change in position occurs. After that mass ## M ## performs simple harmonic motion with this energy that it has acquired. You can compute the maximum ## x ## that occurs in the simple harmonic motion, and thereby compute ## T_{2 \, max}=k (x_{max}-L) ##. I get, with a quick calculation, that the simple harmonic motion (at frequency ## \omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{M}} ## ) has amplitude ## \frac{T_{10}}{\sqrt{kM}} ##, so that ## \\ ## ## x_{max}-L=\frac{T_{10}}{\sqrt{kM}} +\frac{Mg}{k} ##, and that ## T_{2 \, max}=T_{10} \sqrt{ \frac{k}{M}}+Mg ##. ## \\ ## For most cases, with a quick jerk, ## T_{2 \, max} <<T_{1 \, max} ##. ## \\ ## Meanwhile, with a steady pull on ## T_1 ## the tension ## T_2=T_1+Mg ##, and ## T_2 ## (the tension in the upper string) is larger and the upper string breaks.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top