Physics Grad School: How Big a Deal Is Proceedings Paper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scorinaldi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Publishing a proceedings paper, such as one from the SPIE conference, differs from publishing in a peer-reviewed physics journal. Proceedings papers are typically not considered as prestigious as journal articles because they often involve known reviewers, and the work presented may be preliminary or unfinished. While they can be listed as published work on applications, their impact on graduate school admissions may be perceived as less significant compared to journal publications. Some researchers have encountered challenges when submitting to journals, as prior publication in proceedings can lead reviewers to question the novelty of the work. Overall, while proceedings papers have value, especially for presenting ongoing research, they may not carry the same weight in graduate admissions as traditional journal articles.
scorinaldi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hey physics grad school gurus,

i am an undergraduate senior applying to physics graduate school for next fall.

working with one of my advisors we published a proceedings paper for the 2007 SPIE noise and fluctations conference this year. ( http://spie.org/x6628.xml )

how different is this from publishing a paper in a physics journal? are proceedings papers the same as papers accepted in physics journals? or are they less of a big deal in the eyes of graduate physics admissions boards? do they matter at all?

thanks for your input!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SPIE's not bad.

It's not a journal publication, in that you usually know the reviewers (your colleagues), but you can put it down as published proceedings.

e2a: for me it's more about presenting current, unfinished work.

Also, I've had reviewers for journals tell me my stuff's not new because it's already appeared in my SPIE articles -- of course, they have to be argued down. These days, I like to fill the SPIE pages with large pictures :smile:
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top