I Physics in a universe with instant communication

AI Thread Summary
In a hypothetical universe with instant communication, the laws of physics would differ significantly from our own, as Galilean relativity would replace Einstein's relativity. In this scenario, the speed of light would not be constant, and relativistic effects like time dilation and length contraction would not occur. The implications for chemistry and the behavior of matter are uncertain, as current theories are based on relativistic principles. Instantaneous communication could lead to a universe where events happen simultaneously, challenging the very concept of existence. Ultimately, such a universe raises fundamental questions about the nature of reality and communication.
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Messages
2,346
Reaction score
124
Faster-than-light communication is not allowed in this universe. Imagine a sister universe that looks much the same as ours but allows instant communication between any two points. In that universe, simultaneity can be established using instantaneous communication. How would that affect our* description of the universe through laws of physics? In such a universe, would speed of light still be constant? Would there be time dilation? Would objects elongate with velocity?
———
*Assuming human-like species would have evolved in such a universe.
 
Space news on Phys.org
That's the Galilean space-time of PHY101.
 
robphy said:
That's the Galilean space-time of PHY101.
What he said.

It's a perfectly consistent physics, basically the state of the art around the middle of the 19th century. There's Galilean relativity instead of Einstein's relativity, so no relativistic effects such as time dilation or length contraction. The speed of light is not constant because the law of addition of velocitiies is the Galilean ##w=u+v## instead of the relativistic ##w=(u+v)/(1+uv/c^2)## - the latter form doesn't even make sense if the speed of light is not constant.

As for what the universe would be like? We really don't know, because all of our theories about the behavior of subatomic particles are relativistic (as well as quantum mechanical). Thus that mid-19th century physics provides no basis for chemistry and many of the physical properties of matter.
 
Last edited:
EnumaElish said:
Faster-than-light communication is not allowed in this universe. Imagine a sister universe that looks much the same as ours but allows instant communication between any two points. In that universe, simultaneity can be established using instantaneous communication. How would that affect our* description of the universe through laws of physics? In such a universe, would speed of light still be constant? Would there be time dilation? Would objects elongate with velocity?
———
*Assuming human-like species would have evolved in such a universe.

In short if instantaneous communication is allowed then the Universe cannot exist because pretty much everything will happen all at once.
 
One should distinguish
"allowing instantaneous communication"
from
"requiring that all communication is instantaneous".
 
  • Like
Likes M Saad
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top