Intro Physics Physics Introduction book

  • Thread starter Thread starter cosmicvoid
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Sears and Zemansky's University Physics and Halliday and Resnick's Fundamentals of Physics are both popular choices among undergraduate physics students. Many recommend using both texts to gain a broader understanding of concepts. Some participants suggest exploring additional resources like Young and Freedman's University Physics for a different perspective. The choice may depend on the specific curriculum and personal learning style. Ultimately, using multiple references can enhance comprehension and retention of physics principles.
cosmicvoid
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Hi, I'm an undergraduate physics student and I'm currently in my second week of the first semester. I wonder if I should use Sears and Zemansky's University Physics or Halliday and Resnick's Fundamentals of Physics as my book reference. Which one do you guys think is the best? or if there's any better book out there please let me know! =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use both. The more the better.
 
cosmicvoid said:
Hi, I'm an undergraduate physics student and I'm currently in my second week of the first semester. I wonder if I should use Sears and Zemansky's University Physics or Halliday and Resnick's Fundamentals of Physics as my book reference. Which one do you guys think is the best? or if there's any better book out there please let me know! =)
What textbook are you using in the class?
 
Halliday's book
 
I agree with @pines-demon: the intelligent use of multiple sources is a core skill for a STEM student. These are two of the finest introductory physics books out there. I suggest you study a topic first on the one that is used in class, and then read the same topic on the other one looking for different explanations, viewpoints, and original excercises, instead of re-reading the first one.
 
pines-demon said:
Use both. The more the better.
While I in general believe this, I believe it is of limited utility for freshman books. Both of the books are good. Since it is chosen for your class, I would choose Halliday and Resnick. If you have additional time to devote to the topic, I would solve additional problems.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Back
Top