Physics Lectures: Should Focus on Problem Solving or Concepts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lectures Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether physics lectures should prioritize problem-solving of challenging problems instead of covering concepts that are already available in textbooks and online resources like MIT OpenCourseWare. It highlights that the approach may vary depending on the audience, such as theoretical physics students versus those in standard sequences for science and engineering majors. While solving problems in class could enhance students' problem-solving skills, there is a concern that this might lead to accepting physics concepts without understanding their derivations. The importance of professors demonstrating the validity of equations and concepts is emphasized, alongside the responsibility of students to critically assess the material. Overall, the debate reflects on the balance between conceptual understanding and practical problem-solving in physics education.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
Would it be a better idea for physics lectures to cover problem solving of difficult problems, rather than doing lectures on concepts that are repeated in textbooks and can be shown in video lectures, such as the ones in MIT OCW?

of course, it may depend on who the physics lectures are geared towards. if it's really theoretical, then it should be tailored to problem solving obviously. But what if it's a standard sequence that both science and engineering majors go through?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do have a valid point. If your physics professor were to solve physics problems in lecture, you'd probably end up being better at solving physics problems. However, you'd basically be accepting the physics on blind faith. That is not physics, science, or even academic. Therefore, I'd argue, the professor has an obligation to derive the equations and prove to you that he is not pulling them out of thin air. I'd also argue that you have an obligation to prove to yourself that all the equations and concepts are sound, although that would be hypocritical of myself. Just my $.02.
 
That wouldn't be fun Sim...
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top