Physics or engineering for study?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for a student in grade 11 who is passionate about both physics and engineering. The participant expresses interest in theoretical physics, particularly in cosmology, quantum mechanics, and general relativity, while also being drawn to engineering fields like aerospace and robotics. The conversation explores the implications of choosing one path over the other and the potential for interdisciplinary studies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that pursuing pure research or teaching in physics typically requires a Ph.D., while engineering can be pursued with just a Bachelor's degree.
  • Others argue that there are many fields that blend physics and engineering, such as accelerator science, detector physics, and medical physics, which could satisfy both interests.
  • A participant questions the dichotomy between theoretical physics and engineering, suggesting that there are fields that allow for both theoretical exploration and practical application.
  • Concerns are raised about job security and financial considerations in choosing between physics and engineering, with some suggesting that engineering may offer more immediate job prospects.
  • One participant mentions the importance of being exposed to various areas of physics and engineering before making a decision, indicating that the student may not yet be aware of all available options.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for combining aerospace engineering with physics, highlighting the desire for a connection to the real world.
  • A later reply mentions that good theorists often remain in touch with experimental work, suggesting a pathway for those interested in both theory and practical applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on whether to pursue physics or engineering. Some emphasize the need for a Ph.D. in physics for research roles, while others highlight the potential for interdisciplinary fields. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path forward for the student.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the decision may depend on various factors, including job market considerations and personal interests, but these factors are not universally agreed upon. There is also an acknowledgment that the student may not have full knowledge of all possible fields that bridge physics and engineering.

Abtinnn
Messages
58
Reaction score
7
Hi guys!

I'm currently studying in grade 11. I am very passionate about physics and I already am ahead of some undergrad university levels. However, I am a bit indecisive about my future :-/

I love physics and I would want to do theoretical physics in a field like cosmology, quantum mechanics, or general relativity. But I also love engineering, and I love to design and build stuff. For engineering I'm planning on either aerospace or robotics engineering.

What is your opinion? Please let me know
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to do pure research or teach Physics, then Physics is the way to go. If you want to design and build things, then Engineering is the way to go. For Physics, I'll have to caution you that if you want to conduct pure research in Physics, you will need a Ph.D. Not to say you cannot get involved with pure research with a Bachelors/Masters degree, however if you do so with a Physics education that is less than a Ph.D. you will likely be a technician. As a technician you would be building, setting up, and running equipment for the Ph.D. Physicists to conduct their experiments. A technician would also collect and reduce experimental data.
Engineers on the other hand don't really need a Ph.D. to design and build things, they can do so with just a Bachelors degree.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abtinnn
Consider the other part of what a job is for in your decision: making money.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abtinnn
I am not from the States myself but when I look at some of these engineering programs, they look like standard physics programs here in Europe.

http://engineering.berkeley.edu/academics/undergraduate-guide/academic-departments-programs/civil-environmental-engineering

What the hell is the difference anyway? Also what is it with the current mentality to put people in well defined boxes?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abtinnn
Abtinnn said:
Hi guys!

I'm currently studying in grade 11. I am very passionate about physics and I already am ahead of some undergrad university levels. However, I am a bit indecisive about my future :-/

I love physics and I would want to do theoretical physics in a field like cosmology, quantum mechanics, or general relativity. But I also love engineering, and I love to design and build stuff. For engineering I'm planning on either aerospace or robotics engineering.

What is your opinion? Please let me know

Unfortunately (?), we get many questions like this, and they pop up very frequently. And I continue to be baffled by such things and I had never gotten any kind of reasonable response on how someone can have such a dichotomy.

To me, "theoretical physics" is on the opposite extreme of "engineering" and building stuff. They are on opposite ends. So someone who considers doing only one or the other seems to be considering only one extreme field or the other, AS IF, there is nothing else in between! How about choosing a field of study that can comfortably straddle the theory aspect of doing physics AND you also get to design and build things as well, i.e. get your cake and eat it too?!

There are many areas of physics and engineering that do that: accelerator science, detector physics, device physics, material science, medical physics, etc. There is a VERY good chance that you haven't been exposed to all the many different areas of physics and engineering yet, so your knowledge in what is out there is severely incomplete.

BTW, at your age, there is a very good chance also that you will NOT end up doing what you think you want to do right now:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/career-poll-2.667559/

Zz.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela, Abtinnn and PFuser1232
russ_watters said:
Consider the other part of what a job is for in your decision: making money.
Yes I have considered that a lot. In that case, something like aerospace is better.
The thing is that if I choose engineering, it'd be a good thing because there is always something to do/build. But physics sound a bit riskier. I look at other theories and concepts and I ask myself "if I were that guy, would I have come up with this?" and I can't really answer that...

P.S. I am going to have to study in Canada, so the best university that I could go to would be u of t. And I'm not sure if u of t engineering is better than physics or not.

ZapperZ said:
Unfortunately (?), we get many questions like this, and they pop up very frequently. And I continue to be baffled by such things and I had never gotten any kind of reasonable response on how someone can have such a dichotomy.

To me, "theoretical physics" is on the opposite extreme of "engineering" and building stuff. They are on opposite ends. So someone who considers doing only one or the other seems to be considering only one extreme field or the other, AS IF, there is nothing else in between! How about choosing a field of study that can comfortably straddle the theory aspect of doing physics AND you also get to design and build things as well, i.e. get your cake and eat it too?!

There are many areas of physics and engineering that do that: accelerator science, detector physics, device physics, material science, medical physics, etc. There is a VERY good chance that you haven't been exposed to all the many different areas of physics and engineering yet, so your knowledge in what is out there is severely incomplete.

Zz.

Well the thing is that I love theory, but I don't usually like it when things are always up in my head. I want to somehow make a connection to the world, which is why I like engineering as well. Also would you think there is a way of combining, say, aerospace and physics?
 
I forgot to add: would anyone recommend engineering physics? :-/
 
A good theorist is always in touch with experiment (i.e. not a cosmologist or quantum gravity theorist); working in something more "mundane" such as condensed matter physics gives you a reasonable chance that you'll be in touch with the real world.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abtinnn
  • #10
Hmm alright
Thanks a lot! :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K