Physics or Engineering: Which Is the Right Path for a Future in Astrophysics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter golu14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bsc Physics
AI Thread Summary
Choosing between a BSc in Physics and an Engineering degree involves weighing personal interests against career prospects. A BSc in Physics appeals to those fascinated by fundamental concepts like the universe and relativity, but job opportunities in astrophysics can be limited, often requiring further study such as an MSc before pursuing a PhD. In contrast, an Engineering degree, while potentially less aligned with deep theoretical interests, offers more immediate job security and higher earning potential. Engineering fields like aerospace can merge interests in physics with practical applications, allowing for involvement in space exploration and related technologies. Ultimately, the decision should reflect both passion for the subject matter and practical career considerations.
golu14
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
BSc Physics (major) or Enggineering?

I just completed my school and have the above dilemma, i have been thinking about it for a while but couldn't decide.
Im really interested in physics(even though I am a little weak at it) and want to pursue a career as an astrophysicist.
i personally think that enggineering has way too many subjects/topics i wouldn't want to study like making engines, soldering, knowing how machines work and so on, and it will take a whole year extra to complete as compared to BSc (3 vs 4)
Im really more interested in deeper things like the universe, relativity, space and time etc.

What are the pros and cons of both?
Will i still need to do MSc before i do PhD if i go with engg?
What would be the best engg field for me?

Any other tips?

Thanks! (:

EDIT: i am aware that engineering gets me more job opportunities.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the pros and cons of both?

Engineering Pros:

Money.
You'll always have a job.
You'll get to launch rockets or design motors or play with electricity or whatever you want to do, and it'll benefit thousands and maybe even millions or billions of people.
You get out of college much sooner.

Engineering Cons:

It can get a little dreary if you land one of the many "boring" engineering jobs.
You're not as smart as a physicist - probably.

Physics Pros:

You get to study at the forefront of human knowledge.

Physics Cons:

You probably won't get to study at the forefront of human knowledge, at least if the physicists on the board here are right when they say that your chances of landing a job in the field you want are very low.

Will i still need to do MSc before i do PhD if i go with engg?

Conventional wisdom holds that industry engineers don't need to do a Masters, but research/academia engineers should do at least a Masters and probably a PhD at some point.

What would be the best engg field for me?

I, like you, held a fascination for the universe, but my interests manifested as a desire to help create the machines that would drive exploration of the final frontier. Naturally I went aerospace engineering.

Aeroeng is also pretty multifaceted. You can plot orbital trajectories, you can design rocket motors, you can model reentry heat transfer, you can model aerodynamic drag, you can design stable structures, you can design systems that control pitch, yaw, and roll - and that's just the astronautical part. There are other interesting things to look at in aeronautics. The sky's the limit when it comes to what you want to specialize in (pun fully intended).
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top