Physics Question involving a person pulling himself up

  • Thread starter Thread starter CoolGod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
A person pulling himself up on a swing using a rope experiences a tension of 250N, which is less than the combined weight of the swing (160N) and the person (320N), indicating he is descending. The discussion highlights the complexity of the forces involved, particularly whether the rope's tension can effectively lift the person. It is clarified that the person’s pulling creates a mechanical advantage, allowing him to ascend despite the apparent weight. The calculations reveal that the chair accelerates upward at approximately 0.40875 m/s², with a net force acting on it calculated to be 83.33N downward. Overall, the analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding free body diagrams to clarify the forces at play in such scenarios.
CoolGod
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A person is sitting on a swing/seat/platform and pulling himself up with a rope. Don't worry about the swing part. One end of the rope is attached to 2 other metal wires connected to the seat. The other end of the rope is attached to a spring scale and is being pulled by the person. The rope goes above and passes through a pulley. Like in this diagram. http://imageshack.us/a/img845/3343/phydia2.png
the swing weighs 160n, the person weighs 320n and the scale reads 250n.Is the swing/seat/platform going up or down? What is the force exerted by the person on the seat. What is the acceleration of the system.
Since scale reads 250n that should be tension in the rope. he must be exerting 250n. Thus 320+160 >250 thus he is going down.
The hard part of this question is that when the person pulls the rope/scale does the rope or scale pull him back up? Because if it does then technically he'd be going up. In this question can i replace his pull with a 250n block of mass? If he is going up, how is it possible for someone to exert 250n and move 480n up without mechanical advantage.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since scale reads 250n that should be tension in the rope. he must be exerting 250n. Thus 320+160 >250 thus he is going down.

Didn't I just read that the rope goes over a pulley. the rope is attached to the platfrom and the man is pulling on the other end.

Because if it does then technically he'd be going up. In this question can i replace his pull with a 250n block of mass

That would be a completely separate problem.

Best to draw one or 2 FBD ( free body diagram ), perhaps one of the man and one of the platfrom.
 
Hmm 256bits i don't understand where you are confused. fundamentally is he going up or down?
 
CoolGod said:
Hmm 256bits i don't understand where you are confused. fundamentally is he going up or down?

That's for you to figure out. Please show us your FBD(s).
 
i solved for the answer and he is going up. Since he pulls 2 m for every m he goes up, and work is same then it is similar to mechanical advantage of 2. Thus ((2*250)-480)/(480/9.81)=0.40875 m/s^2. so chair is accelerating at 0.40875m/s^2 and the force acting on it is fg 160n down fpc (missing force)down and tension 250n up so we get (250-160)-(0.40875*(160/9.81)) for fpc or 83.3333 N down.
 
Last edited:
Looks OK to me .
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top