Physics:series of 3 lenses calculate mag

  • Thread starter Thread starter ally.hady
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses
AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of finding the final image position and overall magnification from a series of three lenses, start by calculating the image distance from the first lens using the lens formula. The image formed by the first lens becomes the object for the second lens, requiring adjustment for the distance between the lenses. Continue this process for the third lens to determine the final image position. While diagrams can aid in visualizing the problem, they are not strictly necessary if calculations are carefully tracked. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between object and image distances across multiple lenses.
ally.hady
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object is placed 10.0 cm from a series of 3 lenses. The first lens has focal length of 5.00 cm, the second lens has a focal length of 9.00 cm and the final lens has a focal length of 3.00 cm. the distance between each lens is 25.0 cm. Find the final position of the image and the overall magnification.


Homework Equations



1/f=1/Di + 1/Do

Di= distance to image, DO, distance to object. f= focal

The Attempt at a Solution


i don't know where to start here I am used to doing one lense questions please help

thanks.
Ally
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make a figure first. Then calculate the image distance from the first lens. The image will be the object for the second lens, find its distance from it and use as object distance in the lens equation to find the position of the second image which will be the object for the third lens.

ehild
 
Diagrams i thought of it before but it takes too much time and our teacher has allowed us to use diagrams on the test coming up but he also told us its not worth it due to the time distribution for all of the questions. do you think i can do this without drawing a diagram? forexample use the object to find images height then use that but the problem I am going to run into i think is the distance of 2ndobject (1st image) how am i going to calculate the distance of it? would it be x-25cm. the x representing the distance of image for the 1st lense? and the answer i get from x-25 would be distance of object for second lens? thankyou for taking the time to help appreciate it!
 
ally.hady said:
the problem I am going to run into i think is the distance of 2ndobject (1st image) how am i going to calculate the distance of it?

You can see that from a diagram at once.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • threelenses.JPG
    threelenses.JPG
    4.1 KB · Views: 395
thankyou sir
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top