Physics - Single Slit Diffraction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and interpretation of the equations governing single slit diffraction, particularly focusing on the conditions for constructive and destructive interference. Participants explore the implications of path differences for light rays emitted from different positions within the slit.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the derivation of the minima for single slit diffraction, noting that destructive interference occurs when the path difference is 1/2 lambda, leading to the equation W sin T = m (lambda).
  • Another participant suggests that a more comprehensive derivation should consider the interference between all pairs of rays across the slit, referencing Huygen's construction.
  • Multiple participants argue about the path difference for light rays at the edges of the slit, with one claiming that if W sin T is an integral multiple of the wavelength, it should also indicate constructive interference.
  • There is a discussion about why light rays spaced apart by the entire width of the slit are not counted in the context of destructive interference, with one participant asserting that only one pair of rays can be considered for constructive interference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of light rays within the slit and the conditions for constructive versus destructive interference. No consensus is reached regarding the validity of the interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving interference conditions and the assumptions made about the contributions of light rays from various positions within the slit. There are unresolved questions about the completeness of the derivations presented.

jakeswu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys, my textbook mentioned that how the equation for the minima for single slit diffraction was derived:

Consider a slit of width W with 2 light rays, one emitting from the edge, one emitting from the center. Their path difference is W/2 sin T . If the path difference is 1/2 lambda, then they will experience destructive interference. Same can be said for light rays spaced apart by W/3, W/4, so on. Hence the general equation for the minima, W sin T = m (lambda).

This is perfectly reasonable. However, I say:

Consider 2 light rays emitting from the single slit at each edge. Path difference will be W sin T. If W sin T were an integral multiple of wavelength, there should be constructive interference. So W sin T = m lambda can be the equation for constructive interference too.

Why is it that light rays spaced apart by the entire width of the slit aren't counted?
 
Science news on Phys.org
A less cheating derivation would take the interference between all pairs of rays into account. Usually this is done using Huygen's construction, eg. eq 7.2 in http://phyweb.phys.soton.ac.uk/quantum/lectures/waves7.pdf has an integral over the entire slit width.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jakeswu said:
Consider a slit of width W with 2 light rays, one emitting from the edge, one emitting from the center. Their path difference is W/2 sin T . If the path difference is 1/2 lambda, then they will experience destructive interference.

In other words, if the positions across the slit are x=0 through x=W, then the rays coming from x=0 and x=w/2 interfere destructively. So do the rays coming from x=d and x=w/2+d where d is a small increment. So do the rays coming form x=2d and x=w/2+2d. Etcetera. The rays coming from all positions across the slit can be put into pairs like this, each with the path difference (w/2)sin(theta). Each pair cancels destructively, so the net result is complete destructive interference.

However, I say:

Consider 2 light rays emitting from the single slit at each edge. Path difference will be W sin T. If W sin T were an integral multiple of wavelength, there should be constructive interference. So W sin T = m lambda can be the equation for constructive interference too.

Why is it that light rays spaced apart by the entire width of the slit aren't counted?

Because there is only one such pair of light rays. None of the other light rays emerging from the slit can be put into such a pair, that cancels destructively.
 
Thanks for the advice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K