Physics Undergrad Struggles to Retain Knowledge

  • Thread starter Thread starter LyleJr
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A Physics undergraduate nearing graduation expresses concern about retaining knowledge from a recently completed quantum mechanics (QM) course after only covering the first four chapters of Griffiths' textbook. Despite performing well and enjoying the class, there is anxiety about forgetting material before entering graduate school in theoretical research. The discussion emphasizes the importance of repetition for retention and suggests strategies such as reading the same material from different sources to create connections and enhance memory. Supplementing studies with MIT lecture videos and engaging in online forums discussing QM questions are recommended as effective methods for reinforcing knowledge. The course balanced both differential equations and algebra, with a focus on linear algebra in Chapter 3, but the student feels the coverage was insufficient for long-term retention.
LyleJr
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am a Physics undergrad with 3 semesters left. I just finished my first QM course this past Spring and did very well and enjoyed the class greatly, but I find that information is already starting to slip away from my memory banks, as it were. It's so much to take in and to be honest, we only covered the first 4 chapters of our textbook (Griffiths).

I know repetition is my best friend when it comes to retaining knowledge, but it is a bit daunting especially considering I want to continue on to grad school in a theoretical research field. I have this fear of getting accepted into a program and then making a fool of myself because I have forgotten so much.

No real question here, just venting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Read the same material from different sources and relate what you read in a new source to what you have seen already in the previous ones. This helps to create connections that are not so easily forgotten.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, Demystifier and LyleJr
A. Neumaier said:
Read the same material from different sources and relate what you read in a new source to what you have seen already in the previous ones. This helps to create connections that are not so easily forgotten.

Thanks! I have been doing something similar, at least with QM, by supplementing my reading with lecture videos from MIT. It really does help.
 
Or just hang out in sites that discuss QM questions and have a QA format and just reading the posts alone should help keep them fresh.
 
  • Like
Likes LyleJr
Did it emphasize the differential equations or the algebra? If the former, have a look at Dirac's book and see how the algebra leads to the calculus.
 
Hendrik Boom said:
Did it emphasize the differential equations or the algebra? If the former, have a look at Dirac's book and see how the algebra leads to the calculus.

I think it did a decent job at both. The entirety of Chapter 3 was spent formalizing the material within Linear Algebra, but again we only did Chapters 1-4 which was just less than half the book.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top