Physics vs EE enrollments, is there a rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jorgelopez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ee Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the correlation between the number of physics majors and electrical engineering (EE) majors at universities, specifically referencing data from the University of Texas El Paso. The observed ratios of physics majors have declined from 7% in 2005 to 3.4% in 2008, which is significantly lower than the rumored 10% ratio. Participants express skepticism about the existence of a strong correlation, noting that many EE students do not have an interest in physics and that the two departments often do not communicate about enrollment figures. The conversation highlights the idea that high school students interested in physics may choose EE for better job prospects, but this is contested. There is a call for data from other institutions to either support or refute the proposed ratio, as understanding these trends could inform departmental decisions regarding physics enrollment.
Jorgelopez
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I once heard that the number of physics majors is always in direct proportion to those of electrical engineering in the same school, is that true? Here at U Texas El Paso the ratio has been:

  • 7% (2005)
    5.4% (2006)
    4.7 (2007)
    3.4 (2008)
.
This is of interests because what I heard was that the ratio was approximately 10% and we are way below.

Does anybody else have some numbers on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I really doubt there is a much of a correlation. A lot of electrical engineers that I know don't even like physics and the two colleges that handle engineering and physics aren't really in communication about enrollment.
 
You are right, the EE and Physics departments do not talk to each other, but the idea behind the supposed ratio is a different one. It is argued that many high school students interested in physics do not go all into physics but mainly into EE to improve their chances at getting a job after graduation; this effect is supposed to construct the 10 -to-1 ratio.

A simple comparison of ratios from other universities would easily confirm or destroy the theory.
 
I agree with roeb. I know a few people in EE, each of which doesn't like pure physics. So I wouldn't agree that people who are interested in physics go into EE for the job prospects.
 
Thanks for your opinions.

Let me re-phrase the question: can anybody provide data of the ratio of physics majors compared to EE majors? Trend of ratios would be even better.

The average of ratios of several intitutions (provided the standard deviation is not too large) may help me (and many other Chairs) decide if our physics population is large or small than it ought to be.

Thanks.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top