Pigtail Antenna Cable: Can It Be Substituted With Coaxial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter david90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna Cable
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential substitution of pigtail cables with coaxial cables in the context of WiFi applications, specifically for connecting antennas to wireless PCI cards. Participants explore the characteristics and specifications of both types of cables and their implications for performance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that "pigtail" is a descriptive term for a short length of cable, which may not necessarily be coaxial.
  • Coaxial cables come in various specifications, including nominal impedance, dielectric material, and attenuation, which depend on the application.
  • One participant suggests that for RF applications, it may be beneficial to investigate coaxial cables that could be less lossy than those typically provided with wireless cards.
  • Another participant emphasizes that using a cable with a different impedance than the nominal 50 ohms could reduce the range of the connection.
  • There is mention of the importance of considering the velocity factor and connector types, such as N-type connectors, to minimize loss.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the technical significance of the term "pigtail" and the implications of using different types of cables. There is no consensus on whether coaxial cables are definitively better substitutes for pigtail cables in all scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful selection of cable specifications based on the specific RF application, indicating that the choice of impedance and other parameters can significantly affect performance.

david90
Messages
311
Reaction score
2
Can pigtail cable be substitute with coaxial cable?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not sure what application you have in mind. Are you feeding an antenna? to an rf transmitter or reciever? :rolleyes:

In my experience a pigtail cable, is a more of a descriptive term for a "short length" of almost any kind of cable and not necessaily coaxial.

Coaxial cable comes in many specifications depending on your application, things like nominal impedance, type of dielectric material, center wire may be solid or stranded, attenuation - dB signal loss, which is dependent on frequency of signal you may be using, etc.

here is an example of a few coaxial cable specifications:
http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/coax_chart.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WiFi application

Pigtail is a skinny cable that connects an antenna to wireless PCI card.
 
david90 said:
WiFi application

Pigtail is a skinny cable that connects an antenna to wireless PCI card.

Okay, the pigtail as I mentioned above, describes a short length of wire, which can be of any type..

Your application is definitely RF, so I would investigate using one of the coaxial cables. Do a little web search for that cable spec. You may actually find a better cable (less lossy) to use, than that which come with those cards :approve:
 
david90 said:
WiFi application

Pigtail is a skinny cable that connects an antenna to wireless PCI card.


“Pigtail” is a term I’ve often used and often heard but it has no technical significance.

What you are describing is likely to be a short coaxial conductor with a nominal impedance of 50ohms.

Using a cable of different impedance will lessen the range.
 
“Pigtail” is a term I’ve often used and often heard but it has no technical significance.

It generally is a descriptive term, referring to a short length of cabling.
(no doubt coming from idea that a pig's tail coils and is fairly short)

What you are describing is likely to be a short coaxial conductor with a nominal impedance of 50ohms.

Using a cable of different impedance will lessen the range.

Choice of 50 \Omega characteristic impedance is a reasonable starting point. However that impedance is not useful for all RF applications, so careful choice should be made in each case. Another useful parameter to consider is velocity factor.

Though the application in the following URL, is for CCTV (closed circuit television), here is an excellent primer for learning about coaxial cable parameters. http://www.pfm.howard.edu/infosys/choosing_correct_cable.pdf

Also try to choose connectors that are less lossy, such as N-type. The PCI cards vary as to which connector is needed for that end of the cable, so be sure to find out what end-connector your card uses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K