Pion Nucleon Scattering and Group Theory in Quantum Field Theory

Physiana
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Pion Nucleon Scattering and a bit about group theory/ representations

Hello everybody,

I am going through Ryder's book about Quantum Field Theory right now. In the chapter about Pion Nucleon scattering he writes the interaction term like

L_{int}=ig \bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \tau_a \psi \phi^a

where the \tau_a are the Pauli matrices. I wonder now; \psi is the nucleon field, \phi the pions
my script of the lecture says that the nucleon is in fundamental representation of SU(2). So we have nucleon dublet corresponding to dimension of the Pauli matrices?
What representation does he use for the Pions? And why does the number \pi^-,\pi^+,\pi^0 correspond to the number of generators and the dimension of the \tau to the number of nucleon States?
I do not exactly understand why I treat the dublet of proton and neutron so differently from the pion fields. Both are Isospin multiplets so I should actually describe them in the same "space"... e.g. regarding the nucleons also as a linear combination of the pauli matrices like we did with the pions, but then actually setting the coefficient of \tau_1 to zero \psi_1 = 0, because we do not have negative nucleon charge... I always thought the number of generators would correspond to the number of multiplets?

Thank you for your help :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there really no one who has an idea?
 
The pion have Ispin 1.
The index a has the values 1,2,3, with 3 being like the z component.
Linear combos of 1 and 2 are + and -
The nucleon charge is q=(1+\tau_3)/2
In vector notation it reads {\vec \tau}\cdot{\vec \phi}.
That is just like s.L in atomic physics, with L=1.
An older book on particle physics may have more detail than Ryder.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top