B What is the relationship between force and distance in planetary motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the relationship between force and distance in planetary motion, emphasizing how similar triangles help establish this relationship. The horizontal force component, Fx, is shown to be negative when x is positive, indicating the attractive nature of gravitational force. This negative sign ensures that the force direction aligns with the physical behavior of the system, regardless of the position of the planet. Participants clarify that while similar triangles relate magnitudes without signs, the negative sign is necessary for accurate physical representation. The conversation concludes with a comparison to Hooke's Law, reinforcing the idea that these principles govern physical interactions.
rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_09.html
9-7
"From this figure we see that the horizontal component of the force is related to the complete force in the same manner as the horizontal distance x is to the complete hypotenuse r, because the two triangles are similar. Also, if x is positive, Fx is negative. That is, Fx/|F|=−x/r, or Fx= −|F|x/r= −GMmx/r3. Now we use the dynamical law to find that this force component is equal to the mass of the planet times the rate of change of its velocity in the x-direction".

I don't understand when the ratio of corresponding magnitudes are equal for similar triangles why is it taking -ve sign with x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rudransh verma said:
I don't understand when the ratio of corresponding magnitudes are equal for similar triangles why is it taking -ve sign with x?
Look at the drawing. The force Fx points to the left (is -ve) whilst x is +ve. Now imagine the planet being on the other side of the y-axis at the mirror-image point. In this case Fx points to the right (is +ve) whilst x is -ve because it on the negative side. The -ve sign in front of x/r makes sure that the gravitational force is attractive and points in the right direction regardless of whether x is +ve or -ve.
 
kuruman said:
Look at the drawing. The force Fx points to the left (is -ve) whilst x is +ve. Now imagine the planet being on the other side of the y-axis at the mirror-image point. In this case Fx points to the right (is +ve) whilst x is -ve because it on the negative side. The -ve sign in front of x/r makes sure that the gravitational force is attractive and points in the right direction regardless of whether x is +ve or -ve.
But mathematically speaking we cannot put -ve sign. We are just using the property of similar triangles. One ratio is not equal to -ve of another ratio.
 
Last edited:
rudransh verma said:
But mathematically speaking we cannot put -ve sign. We are just using the property of similar triangles. One ratio is not equal to -ve of another ratio.
You asked and I replied. Similar triangles can be used to establish relations between magnitudes without reference to signs. This doesn't mean that we are prohibited to put a -ve sign where it belongs. Here, we are describing a physical situation using the language mathematics. Therefore, we are perfectly entitled to put -ve signs where they are needed in order to match the mathematical description to the observed behavior of the system.
 
kuruman said:
The -ve sign in front of x/r makes sure that the gravitational force is attractive and points in the right direction regardless of whether x is +ve or -ve.
kuruman said:
we are describing a physical situation using the language mathematics.
Okay! Thanks.
Like hookes law it is also a law.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top