Planetary Orbits: Decay or Spiral?

AI Thread Summary
Planetary orbits are subject to decay over extremely long timescales due to energy loss from gravitational waves and other factors. While satellites in low Earth orbit experience decay due to atmospheric drag, bodies further from the atmosphere, like the Earth and Moon, do not face significant decay. The Earth is gradually moving away from the Sun due to the Sun's mass loss, while the Moon is moving away from the Earth due to tidal interactions. The energy loss from gravitational waves is minimal and has negligible impact on these orbits. Overall, while orbits can decay, the processes involved are complex and vary significantly based on distance and mass.
gloo
Messages
261
Reaction score
2
So, the moon goes around the earth, the Earth orbits the sun etc...
Are the orbits eventually decaying orbits? That is, given enough time, will the moon hit the earth, Earth go into the sun etc...?? Is that why galaxies are spiralling?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
actually, don't bother, i found other old posts on the question. I was asking b/c if the orbits don't decay, then the law of thermodynamics don't apply in our ability to extract tidal wave energy from the moon orbits. A debate i had with a friend of mine who said orbits will be eternal.
 
The orbits of satellites in low Earth orbit decay, but that is because the Earth's atmosphere extends (very thinly) 1000 km above the surface of the Earth. Satellites well above the atmosphere do not suffer any noticeable decay.

Theoretically orbits will decay because orbiting bodies emit gravitational waves. In the case of the Earth orbiting the Sun, this energy loss is the equivalent of a couple of light bulbs. The Sun is losing mass in the form of electromagnetic radiation and solar wind. This means the Earth is imperceptibly moving away from the Sun, not toward it. The incredibly tiny energy loss due to gravitational waves is too small to matter.

The Moon is perceptibly moving away from the Earth. The tidal interactions that make the Moon move away from the Earth is many, many orders of magnitude larger than the incredibly tiny energy lost through gravitational waves.

Gravitational waves are only significant when the orbiting masses are very large and when the orbital radius is very small.
 
wow! thanks D.H! that was pretty enlightening.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
98
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top