Plastic Failure Mechanisms When X Bar has Area A or 2A

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Failure Plastic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanisms of plastic failure in a structural context, specifically analyzing scenarios where a bar labeled "X" has different cross-sectional areas (A and 2A). Participants explore the implications of these areas on potential failure mechanisms, including the development of plastic hinges and yielding of bars in a given structural state.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants list potential failure mechanisms for bar X with area 2A, including plastic hinges at points D and C, and yielding of both bars X and Y.
  • When area X is A, participants note that plastic hinges at D and yielding of both bars are possible, but question why yielding of X can occur without yielding of Y.
  • One participant proposes that a plastic hinge could develop at C while X yields, questioning the conditions under which this is possible.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the development of a plastic hinge at C is dependent on stress, seeking clarification on why it cannot occur if both bars have the same cross-sectional area.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumption that a plastic hinge at C will always occur, especially if the moment capacity is significantly greater than the yield stress.
  • Participants discuss the need for free body diagrams to validate equations related to the failure mechanisms and stress distributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the conditions under which plastic hinges develop and the yielding behavior of the bars. There is no consensus on the impossibility of certain failure mechanisms, particularly regarding the relationship between the areas of the bars and the development of plastic hinges.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the failure of plastic hinges is a function of stress in the bars, and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions about the relationships between stress, moment capacity, and cross-sectional areas.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
in the following question i am asked to find all the possible mechanisms, in the given state, and then when the "X" bar has an area of A and not 2A
11.JPG


the answers are:

when area of X=2A
i) plastic hinge at D
ii) yielding of Y and X bars
iii) plastic hinge at C, yielding of "Y" bar




when area of X=A
i) plastic hinge at D
ii) yielding of Y and X bars

i understand why these are correct, but why can i not have a situation where "X" yields and Y does not?

also in the second case, where area=A, why is the 3rd option not a possibility??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dell said:
in the following question i am asked to find all the possible mechanisms, in the given state, and then when the "X" bar has an area of A and not 2A
View attachment 25629

the answers are:

when area of X=2A
i) plastic hinge at D
ii) yielding of Y and X bars
iii) plastic hinge at C, yielding of "Y" bar




when area of X=A
i) plastic hinge at D
ii) yielding of Y and X bars

i understand why these are correct, but why can i not have a situation where "X" yields and Y does not?

also in the second case, where area=A, why is the 3rd option not a possibility??

Please show your attempt, and then you'll likely get feedback. (1) Can you draw a schematic where X yields and Y does not? (2) Note that failure of the plastic hinges is a function of stress in the bar (X or Y).
 
i don't really have any calculations or anything like that, just looking at the structure and seeing what will happen if certain points fail, could a plastic hinge not develop at C and then X yield?? or on the other hand X yields and then a hinge at D,??

2)i realize that the [plastic hinge at C is a function of the stress, but why can we never have a situation where there is a plastic hinge at C if the 2 bars have the same cross sectional area??

i know that:

X/3 + 2Y/3 = P
-=-->X=3P-2Y
assuming a plastic hinge at C
P=Y/2+2/3*Mp/L

why can Y not be sigma(y)*A [Xp]

meaning P=Sigma(y)/2+2/3*Mp/L

making X=3*Sigma(y)/2+2*Mp/L-2*Sigma(y)*A
X=2Mp/L-Sigma*A/2

i don't see why this cannot be in the case where the area is A but can be when the area is 2A
 
Dell said:
i don't really have any calculations or anything like that, just looking at the structure and seeing what will happen if certain points fail, could a plastic hinge not develop at C and then X yield?? or on the other hand X yields and then a hinge at D,??

What does "could a plastic hinge not develop" mean? On the second possibility: how could X yield before Y yielding or before D failing?

Dell said:
2)i realize that the [plastic hinge at C is a function of the stress, but why can we never have a situation where there is a plastic hinge at C if the 2 bars have the same cross sectional area??

I'm not following you here. There is always a plastic hinge at C; what do you mean be "why can we never have a situation where there is a plastic hinge at C"?
 
Mapes said:
I'm not following you here. There is always a plastic hinge at C

why will we always have a plastic hinge at C ?? what if Mp>>yield stress? then the bars X,Y will yield long before point C.

in the answer sheet it says that the 3rd option( plastic hinge at C, yielding of "Y" bar) is impossible for a case where X,Y have the same cross sectional area, i cannot understand why this is.
 
"i know that:
X/3 + 2Y/3 = P
-=-->X=3P-2Y"
comment 1: X =3P-2P applies with the plastic hinge at where? (and only there).

"assuming a plastic hinge at C
P=Y/2+2/3*Mp/L"
comment 2: I would like to see a free body diagram accompanying your development of this equation, as it could be wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K