PLAUSIBILITY OF MU = 7 FOR FLORIDIAN STUDENT NEWSPAPER READING HABITS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fear_of_Math
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals
Fear_of_Math
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey ladies and gents,
I have a question that I'm not fully getting.

An FL Student Survey reprts the results for responses on the number of times a week the subject reads a newspaper:

Variable : news
n = 60
mean = 4.1
standard deviation = 3.0
SE mean = 0.387
95% CI = (3.325-4.875)

QUESTION: Is it plausible that mu = 7, where mu is the population mean for all Floridian Student? Explain.
I'm thinking yes, because confdence interval is an estimate of population proportion, and mu is the actual population mean. If this is true, then since we only have 95% confidence, mu could equal 7 because we have 5% that our estimates are incorrect and not between the interval. Yet, if the interval doesn't have 7 in it, how can this be true. I'm confused to this concept.

As always, the help is highly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fear_of_Math said:
Hey ladies and gents,
I have a question that I'm not fully getting.

An FL Student Survey reprts the results for responses on the number of times a week the subject reads a newspaper:

Variable : news
n = 60
mean = 4.1
standard deviation = 3.0
SE mean = 0.387
95% CI = (3.325-4.875)

QUESTION: Is it plausible that mu = 7, where mu is the population mean for all Floridian Student? Explain.
I'm thinking yes, because confdence interval is an estimate of population proportion, and mu is the actual population mean. If this is true, then since we only have 95% confidence, mu could equal 7 because we have 5% that our estimates are incorrect and not between the interval. Yet, if the interval doesn't have 7 in it, how can this be true. I'm confused to this concept.

As always, the help is highly appreciated!

I haven't checked the calculations, so I'm basing this response on the assumption that the endpoints of the interval were correctly calculated.

This interval is an estimate of the population mean , not the proportion as your first sentence states (I'll assume that was a typo). Based on this interval, is it likely that \mu = 7? No, it isn't, since 7 is not located in the interval.

Could the true mean be 7? Yes, but it isn't likely to be, for the reason stated above.
 
Gracias!
And yes, meant to say mean, but it was 1 in the morning...
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
65
Views
13K
Back
Top