Please explain what this bra-ket expression means

jbb
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am reading a paper that uses a quantum mechanical notation that I do not understand. I have found a webpage that explains it, but I do not understand the explanation either:
http://chsfpc5.chem.ncsu.edu/~franzen/CH ...

(let Y represent the Psi)
Specifically, I understand what <Yn|A|Yn> stands for, but I don't understand the significance when the bra and the ket represent different wavefunctions: <Yn|A|Ym>.

The above website states "it gives the average of the physical quantity corresponding to operator A for the wave functions". This confuses me. The expectation value of a single wave function is a concept I understand, but what is the meaning of the expectation value of two wave functions simultaneously? Does it have to do with transition probabilities?

If you could explain this to me or give me a reference, that would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jbb said:
The expectation value of a single wave function is a concept I understand, but what is the meaning of the expectation value of two wave functions simultaneously? Does it have to do with transition probabilities?

Yes, it can of course have different meaning in different context (depending on what A is) but when e.g. calculating transition probabilites it is the matrix element that tells you the probability amplitude that a system in state Ym will make a transition in into state Yn when perturbed by the operator A.
In pertubation theory "A" is essentially the hamiltonian that couples the two system together and can e.g. represent coupling via the electric field.
Look up e..g "Fermi's Golden Rule" (I think there is a wiki page) if you want to know more.
 
f95toli said:
Yes, it can of course have different meaning in different context (depending on what A is) but when e.g. calculating transition probabilites it is the matrix element that tells you the probability amplitude that a system in state Ym will make a transition in into state Yn when perturbed by the operator A.
In pertubation theory "A" is essentially the hamiltonian that couples the two system together and can e.g. represent coupling via the electric field.
Look up e..g "Fermi's Golden Rule" (I think there is a wiki page) if you want to know more.

Thank you very much! Fermi's Golden Rule explains all my questions.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top