B Please help me, I do not understand this sentence in vector mathematics

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter physicophysiology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics Vector
physicophysiology
Messages
12
Reaction score
3
What is the meaning.png

Would you explain this sentence in detail?
 

Attachments

  • What is the meaning.png
    What is the meaning.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 843
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
More context would have been interesting.

While you could use equation 1.100 with complex numbers (the mathematics is fine) it doesn’t make sense in the context that we don’t see - only real values are meaningful.
 
physicophysiology said:
View attachment 228726
Would you explain this sentence in detail?

You must provide more detail about the context of the passage you quoted. What situation is "the geometric situation being described"?
 
mfb said:
More context would have been interesting.

While you could use equation 1.100 with complex numbers (the mathematics is fine) it doesn’t make sense in the context that we don’t see - only real values are meaningful.
Thank you I understood it
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top