Chemistry Please help me in finding this relative molecular weight

AI Thread Summary
To determine the relative molecular weight of solute A, one must first calculate the molarity of the 5% urea solution, which is isotonic with a 0.877% solution of solute A. Since isotonic solutions contain the same number of moles, the molarity of urea can be used to find the molarity of solute A. The calculations involve using the concentration of urea to find the equivalent concentration of solute A, leading to the determination of its molecular weight. Understanding these relationships and performing the calculations will clarify the process of finding the molecular weight of solute A.
shaiqbashir
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys!

my question goes like this

a 5% solution of urea is isotonics with 0.877% of Solute A. Calculate the relative molecular weight of solute A.


now my dear friend, i know its a very simple question but unfortunately, just can't getting any interpretation. I know isotonics sol means having same no. of moles. and i know that Grahams's law of diffusion as well. Please help me so that i can understand this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question has basicly two component. First you have to find the molarity of the urea solution solution. All the information that you require are in the first 5 words of the question.

The second part requires you to estimate the molecular weight of the solute A using the molarity of the urea solution and that the solutions are isotonic. So you know the molarity of the solute solution and you know the amount of solute A in the solution. You have to calculate your way up to the molecular weight.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
24K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Back
Top