Please help Two friction and Power problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter infinitylord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two physics problems involving friction and power calculations. For the first problem, the user seeks to determine the coefficient of friction on an incline after a block slides up, with feedback suggesting that the formula used is generally correct but could be clearer. In the second problem, regarding Superman stopping a car, it is noted that the question is flawed as it implies Superman expends power rather than absorbing it, and it should specify average power. The suggestion is made to simplify the approach by focusing on energy rather than forces for the second problem. Overall, clarification on the formulas and concepts is requested for both scenarios.
infinitylord
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
I had gotten an answer that I'm very unsure of so I would like clarification and corrections if necessary. Thank you
1.) A block is sliding along a horizontal frictionless surface at 10.3 m/s. It then slides up an incline that has friction and is tilted at 18.0 degrees. Then it slides onto another horizontal frictionless surface that is 1.50 m above the lower one traveling at 9.13 m/s. What is the coefficient of friction on the ramp?

2.) Superman need to stop Lex Luther who is driving a 1.2x10^4 kg car at 150 km/hr. If he stops the car in 2.3s, how much power did Superman use to stop the car?

The Attempt at a Solution


1.)
KEi - ƩW = PEgf + KEf
1/2mv^2 - μmgcosθ = mghf + 1/2mv^2
μ = (ghf - 1/2vi^2 + 1/2vf^2)/-gcosθ(hf-hi)
that was the formula I finished with(even though it can be simplified)
I'm just wondering if this is right at all

2.)
P= W/Δt
W= Fd
F= m(vi/Δt)/Δt
d= VavΔt=1/2VfΔt
W= (m(vi/Δt)/Δt)1/2vfΔt
P= ((m(vi/Δt)1/2vfΔt)/Δt
That was my final formula for that. Again, I can simplify it but this would still give the "correct" answer.
Please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Looks right, though your notation leaves something to be desired. You can make it more readable by clicking "go advanced" and using the superscript and subscript features.
In (2), it becomes so unreadable I've no idea whether it's right. The question is inaccurate in a couple of ways. First, technically, superman would not use power to stop the car so much as absorb power from the car. Energy expended is force x distance measured in the same direction. Here they're in opposite directions, so superman expends a negative amount of energy. Secondly, it should ask for average power. The power involved might vary over the interval.
Wrt to the procedure in (2), it would be simpler just to deal with energy rather than forces.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top