Please help with Motion Problem, looks easy but is confusing (to me)

  • Thread starter Thread starter accesskb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a physics problem involving a boulder dropping from a cliff, where the hiker observes it takes 1.5 seconds to fall the last third of the distance. Participants are trying to determine the height of the cliff, with one student suggesting the answer is approximately 172.5 meters. However, two other contributors calculate the height to be around 356 meters and 328 meters, respectively, indicating a significant discrepancy in their solutions. The original poster expresses frustration with the problem and seeks clarification on the correct approach. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying motion formulas in physics problems.
accesskb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I've spent a long time and wasted lots of paper on this question. It might be very easy to do but I have tried/used every one of the motion formulas and don't seem to get a right answer. This is one of those challenge question that our teacher has given us. He hasn't worked out the answer himself yet but one of the student who was able to get it says the answer is about 172.5m

Please could help me out with this Motion problem. Appreciate all the help. thnx

A hiker sees a boulder drop from the top of a cliff and notices that it takes 1.5seconds for the boulder to fall the last 1/3 of the way to the ground. What is the height of the cliff (in meters)?

here is a rough pic I drew:
http://www.clubbersnation.com/math/physics_problem.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
thnks Ambitwistor for the explanation :)
I have never tried any problems like this before. I shall work it out now. :smile:
 
My answer is about 356m. There's no difference between my solution and Ambitwistor's .


LTK
 
Luong tu Khanhwrote
My answer is about 356m. There's no difference between my solution and Ambitwistor's .

Looks like a difference of 29 meters to me! I get Ambitwistor's answer (well, actually I get 327.7 m which I would round to 328).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top