Please mention all physics animation videos that you know

Click For Summary
The discussion emphasizes the importance of quality in physics animation videos, noting that animations are only effective if created by knowledgeable individuals. While platforms like YouTube can provide a wealth of resources, caution is advised due to the presence of misleading or inaccurate content. Participants highlight the need to supplement animations with reputable sources and textbooks to ensure a solid understanding of physics concepts. The conversation warns against relying solely on animations, as they can lead to misconceptions if not paired with proper scientific literature. Overall, a balanced approach combining animations with credible educational materials is recommended for effective learning.
Nuwebwave
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I want to watch and learn more n more physics concepts with the help of animations, please tell me where can i get more n more videos like this. Such as bernoulli's theorem
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nuwebwave said:
I want to watch and learn more n more physics concepts with the help of animations, please tell me where can i get more n more videos like this. Such as bernoulli's theorem
It would be a nice idea but an animation is only as good as the knowledge of the guy who wrote it. Animations and simulations (same problem), on their own, can give you a very shaky knowledge of Science. You also need to read reputable sites and books and look at equations.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes fresh_42, malawi_glenn, Vanadium 50 and 2 others
Youtube?
 
malawi_glenn said:
Youtube?
Beware junk!
 
sophiecentaur said:
Beware junk!
One mans junk is another mans treasure
 
malawi_glenn said:
One mans junk is another mans treasure
If it's bad Science then it is nobody's treasure. (Fool's gold perhaps)
 
Quick question that I haven't been able to find the answer to. Greenhouse gasses both warm and cool the atmosphere by slowing heat loss to space. But what would happen without GHGs? I read that the earth would be colder (though still relatively warm), but why? Without GHGs the atmosphere would still be a similar mass and still warmed by conduction from the surface, yet without a means to radiate that heat to space. Why wouldn't the atmosphere accumulate heat over time, becoming warmer? How...