Please read if you saw my thread I pasting together this new gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter whatzzupboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Thread
AI Thread Summary
The author expresses gratitude for the feedback received on their previous thread about a new gravity theory, which contributed to their success in a psychology project. They clarify that the theories discussed were intentionally incorrect, serving as a basis for exploring how new ideas can challenge existing beliefs. The author acknowledges the mathematical contradictions in their theories, which were highlighted by a physics professor. They emphasize their age, being a 15-year-old freshman, and reflect on the creative aspect of their work. Overall, the discussion centers on the learning experience and the importance of critical evaluation in scientific exploration.
whatzzupboy
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Please read if you saw my thread "I need help pasting together this new gravity..."

I'm sorry for any and all the calamety I may have caused with my thread "I need help pasting together this new gravity theory I've been trying" in which I listed to diff. sets of theories. I only posted them for a physcology class on people reaction to any and all new ideas that may change certain ways of thinking and learning. But I would also like to say because of y'all I made an A on my physcology mid term project. So sorry and thankyou very much for helping me get an A.
Sincerly,
Mathew Tucker

PS
The theories I used are all incorrect due to several contridictions in the math behind them. I only used those because they were from a project to develope a theory, resonable or not, then prove or disprove it. And one last thing if any thing just seems to far fetch that you do not believe me it might be because I'm only a 15 year old freshman.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Huh. I thought it was a cool theory.
 
:smile:

Fav quotes:

M= Number of Matter
Number of Matter because no matter the mass, location, or time the amount of Magnetic and Electric Energy Released is Equivalent.

Enics are constant in both location and speed
 
Thank y'all but like I said my physics teacher when I handed it into him thought it was very creative and possibly correct so we took it to a physics professor at a near by college and he found I think he said 5 major probles in the math and a bunch of small things.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
359
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top