Plot Polynomial Q10[x] with Variables x & t, Range 0-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter nalkapo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
nalkapo
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I want to plot this polynomial:
Q10[x_] := c* (1 - (t - x)^2)^10

I defined variable 't' in f(t) and 'x' in the polynomial Q10[x].
how can I plot this polynomials with variebles x and t? the range-interval will be (for both x and t): [0,1].

can you write the code please...
Thanks...

Edit: by the way, c~ 3.1. it will be less than Square root[10]
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is this anything like what you are trying to accomplish?

c = 3.1;
Q10[c_,x_,t_] := c*(1 - (t - x)^2)^10;
Plot3D[Q10[c,x,t], {x, 0, 1}, {t, 0, 1}, ViewPoint->{-1.2, -2.4, 2}]
 
Thanks Bill,
I figured it out. I needed to plot in coordinate system, R^2.
actually i didn't give all the details. i tried to use two variables to plot two functions in R^2 but it is not possible. I decreased to one variable and problem was solved.
Thanks for help. at least I got some idea about 3D plot ;)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top