Mathematica Plotting functions and coordinates, Mathematica

AI Thread Summary
Mathematica allows users to plot both functions and coordinates on the same graph using the Show function, which can combine Plot and ListPlot outputs effectively. Users can customize visual aspects like point size, color, and background to enhance their graphs. The discussion also touches on the effectiveness of pseudo-random number generation across different programming languages, suggesting that while hardware random number generators exist, computer-generated numbers are typically sufficient for most applications. A unique idea was proposed for generating random bits from radioactive decay, although it remains largely unpursued. Overall, the conversation highlights practical plotting techniques in Mathematica and considerations for random number generation.
freefaller
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

Is there a way to plot both functions and coordinates/points on the same graph in Mathematica? The various functions for plotting each seem very incompatible. I would like to compare a probability function to Monte-Carlo-method simulation results.

Also, out of curiosity, do different programming languages have "better" pseudo-random number generation techniques or does it not really make a difference?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
data = Table[{x, x^2}, {x, 0, 2}];
Show[
Plot[x^2, {x, 0, 2}],
ListPlot[data],
Graphics[Text["(1,1)", {1, 1}, {-1, 0}]]
]

will show a graph, points and a coordinate.
If you need to you can change point size, color, background, dashing and a thousand other visual effects.

There are expensive hardware random number generators you can buy.

I've wanted someone to think of a cheap hardware hack that would generate a few random bits a second from the radioactive decay of a smoke detector, but I haven't found anyone interested in doing that.
 
Thanks Bill! It works nicely.

I'm self-taught so I ignored Show[]'s existence. Now I know.

That's an interesting hack, although I guess for most purposes computer-generated numbers work fine ... and are simpler to obtain.

Thanks again
 

Similar threads

Back
Top