Poincaré, Ricci flow and Super String Theory

techwonder
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I just read the latest Scientific American and they have an article about the proof of the Poincaré conjecture. Apparently the proof uses a modified (an extra element) Ricci flow and then the article says that the modification to the Ricci flow pops up in Super String Theory :confused: .

Does this relate to the Calabi-Yau manifolds and their possible transformations? How? Is it relevant to String Theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, I believe what is being described is a 3-manifold (3-sphere for the topologist) where I BELIEVE a Calabi-Yau manifold is a 6-manifold. (I may be mistaken).

Secondly, I believe Perelman, when modifying the Ricci flow equation, added a term to the equation. I do believe that this term is often used in string theories.

Still, it very well may be applicable to ST.

Paden Roder
 
Don't know squat about strings but i am curretly (slowly) reading the Perleman papers. There is a ricci like analogue for the renormalization "group" flow in some qft models...no idea if it comes up in string theory.
Mike Anderson has a nice page of notes on the proof and background...maybe that will help you:

http://www.math.sunysb.edu/%7Eanderson/papers.html

And this was the first overview of the papers from the period after the publication of the results:
http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/research/ricciflow/overview102503.pdf

Also, i am not sure how they are viewed/used in string theory but i have always seen calabi Yau spaces defined as 2n dim manifolds with SU(n) holonomy.
So though 6 might be reasonable i see no compelling reason that it is the only dimension.

If you should find out the connection to strings please let us know.
 
Last edited:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top