Point charge - Assertion & Reason type problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a point charge problem characterized by an assertion (A) and a reason (R). Participants express confusion regarding the correctness of A and R, with some arguing that A is true while R is false. There is debate over the nature of the propositions presented, with many noting that options (a) to (d) lack complete logical structure, only presenting "if" statements without conclusions. The consensus leans towards option (e) as the only complete proposition. The main task is to analyze the relationship between the assertion and the reason to determine their validity.
Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


assertion.png
ChargeAR.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



These AR type problems are mostly tricky and debatable . To me, A is correct and R is wrong . Although electron is approximated to be a point particle , but I think if R is true , then A will be wrong .

I think c) is correct . I might be wrong .

I would like to know experts view on this .
 

Attachments

  • ChargeAR.jpg
    ChargeAR.jpg
    12.3 KB · Views: 632
  • assertion.png
    assertion.png
    49.3 KB · Views: 778
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd go for c, but the form of the assertion is a bit unusual. The assertion is not "a point charge is impossible"; rather, it is in itself a line of reasoning, that "since matter..." etc. So if that reasoning is faulty, would we say A is false even though we may agree that a point charge is not possible?
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
I am not sure I understand the question. Are we trying to pick out a correct proposition out of the 5 choices? (a) to (d) are not propositions at all. They contain only the "if" part, with no "then". The only complete proposition is (e).
 
Chandra Prayaga said:
I am not sure I understand the question. Are we trying to pick out a correct proposition out of the 5 choices? (a) to (d) are not propositions at all. They contain only the "if" part, with no "then". The only complete proposition is (e).
In the lower box, the A is an assertion, which may be true or false; the R is a supposed justification for the assertion. The R may be true or false in itself, and it might or might be reasonable to deduce A from R.
The task is to determine which combination of those possibilities applies, as listed in a to e.
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top