Point charge configuration with zero potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating a system of point charges with zero potential energy everywhere. One participant argues that achieving zero potential energy implies a zero electric field, which contradicts Gauss's law. Another points out that the integral used to calculate potential energy may only apply to continuous charge distributions, suggesting that point charges could yield infinite energy. Ultimately, it is concluded that it is possible to configure point charges to have no mechanical energy. The conversation highlights the complexities of potential energy in electrostatics and the implications of charge configurations.
bigerst
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
is it possible to construct a system with only finite number of point charges of arbitrary magnitude at finite distance from each other such that the total potential energy is zero everywhere?
i doubt earnshaw's theorem would prohibit this construction, hence is it possible?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bigerst said:
is it possible to construct a system with only finite number of point charges of arbitrary magnitude at finite distance from each other such that the total potential energy is zero everywhere?

If by potential energy , you mean the following integral:

W=\int{\frac{1}{2}\epsilon E^{2}dv},

then zero total energy means zero electric field everywhere . Zero field around a point charge means zero net flux and this contradicts Gauss law.
 
thanks for the reply.
i think that integral only apply to continuous charge distributions? doesn't it predict the energy of a point charge is infinite.
on another note i think i got the answer, apparently it is possible to assemble point charges such that they have no mechanical energy

bigerst
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top