Point charge electric field help find direction?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the direction of the electric field produced by a point charge of -4.2 µC at two specific points: point a (70 cm north) and point b (76 cm west). The participants clarify that to find the direction of the electric field difference (Eb - Ea), one must draw the vectors for the electric fields at both points, reverse the direction of Ea, and then add the vectors tail to head. The correct magnitudes for the electric fields are calculated as Ea = -77142.57 N/C (south) and Eb = -62326.87 N/C (west), leading to a final angle of 49.69 degrees for the resultant vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and point charges
  • Familiarity with vector addition and subtraction
  • Knowledge of Coulomb's Law for electric field calculations
  • Ability to use inverse tangent for angle determination
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Coulomb's Law and its application in electric field calculations
  • Learn vector addition techniques in physics, specifically for electric fields
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their representation
  • Practice problems involving electric field direction and magnitude calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to understand electric field calculations and vector analysis in electrostatics.

awertag
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok i got the hard parts, a and b. For some reason I'm stuck on part c, the direction of the electric field.

Consider point a which is 70 cm north of a -4.2 µC point charge, and point b which is 76 cm west of the charge.


http://www.webassign.net/giancoli5/17_23alt.gif <------FIGURE

(a) Determine Vba = Vb - Va.
1Your answer is correct. V
(b) Determine Eb - Ea (note this is a vector minus a vector).
Magnitude
2Your answer is correct. N/C
Direction
3Your answer is incorrect.° (counterclockwise from east is positive)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried all the combinations of inverse tangent to try to get theta. Came up with 42.647 47.353 132.647 and 137.353...all wrong. What am I missing? Any good help is appreciated.
--aweg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you just want to find the direction of the field? If so, draw the vectors for the field at a and for the field at b and add them tail to head. The direction of the field at a is the direction in which a positive charge placed at a will move in response to the field produced by Q.

AM
 
Last edited:
that's what i thought at first but I want the direction of Eb-Ea. I don't know if that's different than the direction of the E field?
 
awertag said:
that's what i thought at first but I want the direction of Eb-Ea. I don't know if that's different than the direction of the E field?

To determine \vec{E_b} - \vec{E_a} draw the vectors for the field at a and for the field at b; then reverse the direction of the vector for the field at a (ie. multiply by -1); and then add them tail to head.

I think I see what your problem is. You seem to be using displacement vectors rather than vectors representing the magnitude of the field. You have to determine the magnitude of the field at a and at b (not the potential) and then draw vectors representing those field values. Give us the magnitude and directions of the vectors you get for Eb and Ea.
 
well for part b I had found that Ea=-77142.57 (south) and Eb=-62326.87 (west)
 
so then i added their i and j components, did pythag, and got 99174.892 N/C
 
does that help atall? I'm sorry, I just don't understand your directions :(
 
awertag said:
well for part b I had found that Ea=-77142.57 (south) and Eb=-62326.87 (west)
Show us how you get Eb = -62326.87 N/C. I get a different answer. I also get a different direction for Ea. Both fields are toward Q.

AM
 
really? well i know 62326.87 is right because i used it to get part b which was correct
 
  • #10
awertag said:
really? well i know 62326.87 is right because i used it to get part b which was correct
So why not show us how you got it? I get:

Eb = kQ/r^2 = 9e9 x 4.2e-6/(.76)^2 = 37.8e3/.5776 = 6.544e4 N/C

AM
 
  • #11
yeah i got 6.544e4 now as well. I guess it didn't affect my previous (magnitude) answer because the percent error was tiny (due to the enormity of the numbers). But now, with the direction, i guess that error was enough to mess it up. Thanks for bearing with me...in case you're curious, I got a final angle of 49.69 degrees . (with inverse tangent)
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
956
Replies
9
Views
874