Point charge Exam review question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three point charges placed along a meter stick, with the goal of determining the sign and magnitude of one charge such that the net electrical forces on a second charge are zero. The context is rooted in electrostatics, specifically applying Coulomb's law to analyze the forces between the charges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss equating the forces exerted by the charges on the second charge and explore the implications of signs and magnitudes of the charges involved. There is an examination of how to set up the equations correctly and considerations about the signs of the charges.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the setup of the equations and questioning the assumptions about the signs of the charges. Some guidance has been provided regarding the treatment of the forces and the need to clarify the signs of the charges involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of the signs of the charges, particularly regarding the nature of charge q2 and how it affects the overall balance of forces. Participants are also considering the impact of simplifying the equations by canceling terms.

AnthroMecha
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three charges are placed along a meter stick. One charge, q1, is placed at the 12.1cm mark. A second charge, q2, is placed at the 27.2cm mark. The third charge, q3, is placed at the 48.5cm mark. Charge q1 is equal to +171μC. What must be the sign and magnitude of charge q3 such that the total electrical forces on charge q2 add to zero?

Homework Equations



Coulomb's law

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried equating the Electrostatic force of q1 on q2 to the electrostatic force of q3 on q2, but I don't believe it came out right.

8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (171μC*q2/15.1^2)=-8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (q2*q3/21.3^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AnthroMecha said:
I tried equating the Electrostatic force of q1 on q2 to the electrostatic force of q3 on q2, but I don't believe it came out right.

8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (171μC*q2/15.1^2)=-8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (q2*q3/21.3^2)
Looks like you have the right idea. What must the sign of q3 be?

Get rid of the minus sign in your equation, then solve for q3. Cancel everything that you can first.
 
I stared at a while and realized I can cancel q2 and 8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2. I came up with q3= -340.25μC. I realized that the only way that the charges could balance out is if q3 is positive making the answer 340.25μC. Does this sound right?
 
AnthroMecha said:
I stared at a while and realized I can cancel q2 and 8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2. I came up with q3= -340.25μC. I realized that the only way that the charges could balance out is if q3 is positive making the answer 340.25μC. Does this sound right?
Good. But get rid of the minus sign in your initial equation.

(The first thing you should do is determine the sign of the third charge. Then use your equation to find the magnitude of that charge.)
 
Yeah, the minus sign came from me setting it up like this:

8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (171μC*q2/15.1^2)+8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (q2*q3/21.3^2)=0.

I guess that q2 would be a negative charge, which I think would make the math correct. I'll have to keep an eye on that to make sure my answer is correct to the situation with regard to the sign!

Thanks for the help!
 
AnthroMecha said:
Yeah, the minus sign came from me setting it up like this:

8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (171μC*q2/15.1^2)+8.99 X 10^9 Nm^2/C^2 * (q2*q3/21.3^2)=0.
Yes, I know what you were trying to do. Setting F1 + F2 = 0 is the right idea, but you have to be careful when you write those forces in terms of the charges.

If you treat q3 as a positive charge, then the force it exerts on q2 (assumed positive) will be given by F2 = -kq2q3/d2, where the minus sign indicates that the force points to the left--opposite to the force from q1. Then when you set up your equation and solve for q3 you'll get a positive answer.

Personally, I would just set the magnitudes of the forces equal, and use that to solve for the magnitude of the charge. (You already know what the sign of the charges must be.)
I guess that q2 would be a negative charge, which I think would make the math correct. I'll have to keep an eye on that to make sure my answer is correct to the situation with regard to the sign!
No, it has nothing to do with q2. Remember, q2 dropped out.
 
Oh, ok. Solving for the magnitude does simplify things.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K